Iceggiren i Whitelist or Blacklist JavaScript
Whitelist or Blacklist JavaScript sγur veto
Tiririt sɣur veto
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 7 năm trướcthanks for the review. i will try to fix it on this coming weekend
15 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Demosthene, 3 năm trước
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Krackenn, 4 năm trước
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 16267510, 5 năm trướcRemoves javascript, but doesn't activate
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14636734, 6 năm trướcbest one java extension I've tried on android os! great job.. tnx!
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14506485, 6 năm trước
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur JoaCHIP, 7 năm trướcA simple and to-the-point way of cleaning up messy or rude websites with one click.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Steve Coleman, 7 năm trướcOverall I like this extension because of the controll it gives, but each open window/site needs to maintain its own state (enabled/disabled) and display the icon for that specific state. Right now, changing the state of any one open window changes the icon on every other window such that its state and displayed icon are then out of sync. Changing the state of any open window means you can no longer trust the other windows displayed icon to be telling you the truth. I can't tell you how many times I have tried to reactivate javascript for a window that was already enabled, and only to find that I had to change it back again, thus changing all the icons on the other open windows.
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Fred Thompson, 7 năm trướcWorks great...until it doesn't.
From what I can tell, whitelist failures are when a site is referenced which is not in the list. Makes sense but whitelisting should be applied to a tab, based on the page url. Alternately, there should be 2 types of whitelist; strict and tab. In that case, a yellow checkmark could indicate partial (strict) blocking and the green icon could indicate full whitelist.
Here are examples of sites which don't work properly:
wetransfer.com
wireshark.org
addons.mozilla.org
https://whitelistjavascript.com - yes, the home page of this extension!Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 7 năm trướcthanks for the reply and your testing.
i will apply this 2 types of whitelist; strict and tab.
on strict only resouces in the whitelist will be allowed
and on tab, all resources loaded under this tab url will be allowed. - Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13580909, 7 năm trướcthe storefunction does not work properly on my firefox. I have allways to click again to websides, that I made it before
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12777693, 7 năm trướcThis is a good addon, but due to some bug it constantly blocks Google's services like gmail and google keep, although the plugin runs in blacklist mode and google is definitly not there.
It happens after each browser restartTiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 7 năm trướcthanks for the review. i will try to fix it on this coming weekend - Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13510507, 7 năm trướcWould recommend.
1. It works.
2. I wish there were an option to remove the logo from the URL bar: it serves zero purpose. (If the developer could make another addon that moved the refresh button to the URL bar, that would get a 5 from me.)
3. The other icon (the green tick) is a really bad icon: A green tick could be used for just about any addon and it would vaguely make sense, which is precisely the problem. A green tick doesn't distinguish it at all. I switched to this addon after YesScript stopped working after the Addon apocalypse. That has great icons: a white scroll, which you'll be familiar with if you use Windows, that turns black once you blacklist a site.
4. I wish there were an option to disable auto-refresh. If that's too hard, disable the refresh. I can refresh a page myself.
5. Weird behavior within the addon's options when using drop-down box for changing to blacklist, but that doesn't matter really. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13405391, 7 năm trước
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur hansgruber, 8 năm trướcProduct appears to get in my way for web sites that *should* work. So far, have had to disable the add-on much more than running it as enabled. Will test more; but, for now, causes too many headaches.