NoScript Security Suite에 대한 리뷰
NoScript Security Suite 제작자: Giorgio Maone
Giorgio Maone 님의 답글
개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
리뷰 2,388개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18710229 님, 2일 전This add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 19157064 님, 21일 전Completely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- 5점 만점에 1점Cory Sanin 님, 21일 전One star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19145735 님, 22일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점A Tea Daze 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점jordan9543 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18218075 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Shannon Sobeck 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19088604 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19072892 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점cwqing1973 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14468519 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점rabbitshee 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19047433 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점A. Bilmanda 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Lazer Bear 님, 2달 전