NoScript Security Suite에 대한 리뷰
NoScript Security Suite 제작자: Giorgio Maone
Firefox 사용자 13372577 님의 리뷰
5점 만점에 2점
Firefox 사용자 13372577 님, 8년 전It does work (more or less) so I cannot justify a 1-star rating. But like others have said, this is not the NoScript we knew and loved. And while I know there is a temptation to just blame Firefox57 for old addons no longer working well, the truth is that we cannot blame Firefox57 for the dreadful new interface that NoScript has, nor for the buggy way it works (forgetting your settings, for example).
I don't want to be overly harsh here. For many years this developer has given us a fantastic product that millions of us found "essential". For that he must be commended. However, the new NoScript no longer has a place in my little "arsenal of defence". I've moved on.
If anyone is interested in alternatives, I find uBlock Origin is enough for my needs, provided the "I'm an advanced user" option is checked off and third party scripts / frames are globally blocked ("medium blocking mode", as per the author). If you want more power, there is uMatrix - still not a 100% replacement for NoScript but good enough for the vast majority of people.
I don't want to be overly harsh here. For many years this developer has given us a fantastic product that millions of us found "essential". For that he must be commended. However, the new NoScript no longer has a place in my little "arsenal of defence". I've moved on.
If anyone is interested in alternatives, I find uBlock Origin is enough for my needs, provided the "I'm an advanced user" option is checked off and third party scripts / frames are globally blocked ("medium blocking mode", as per the author). If you want more power, there is uMatrix - still not a 100% replacement for NoScript but good enough for the vast majority of people.
리뷰 2,391개
- 5점 만점에 5점HunterMirror 님, 14시간 전He notado en las demás reseñas, que las personas no parecen comprender el propósito de este addon. La idea es que bloquee los scripts, si una página se rompe por ello, es algo perfectamente esperable, no es culpa de la extensión perse, sino de quien desarrolló dicha página web, queda a tu criterio si lo quieres añadir a la lista blanca o no. Lo realmente triste y reprochable, es más bien que hoy en día hayan tantas páginas que quieran que actives los scripts si o si para poder usarlos, incluso páginas que no los necesitan para nada.
El abuso de los scripts y la manía de convertir las páginas web en "aplicaciones", es lo que ha causado que ahora usar el navegador implique un consumo cada vez mayor de RAM, sin contar los riesgos de seguridad innecesarios del uso de scripts, tanto para el usuario como para el webmaster/desarrollador. Así que por mi parte, prefiero que se rompan las páginas que sean, no les voy a activar los scripts si no son páginas que hagan un uso inteligente y justo de ellas. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18710229 님, 8일 전This add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 19157064 님, 한 달 전Completely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- 5점 만점에 1점Cory Sanin 님, 한 달 전One star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19145735 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점A Tea Daze 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점jordan9543 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18218075 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Shannon Sobeck 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19088604 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19072892 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점cwqing1973 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14468519 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점rabbitshee 님, 2달 전