Redirector에 대한 리뷰
Redirector 제작자: Einar Egilsson
리뷰 364개
개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨You're right, I should probably remove the "Compatible with Firefox Android" thing. I just thought that WebExtensions addons should work anywhere.- 5점 만점에 3점Artem S. Tashkinov 님, 9년 전Why does this add-on require an example for each URL? Makes no sense to me.
Also I would love to import and export to CSV files because generating JSON out of my own rules is a Herculian task.
Also, please, change the view to table or something like that:
COLUMN 1: Name (optional)
COLUMN 2: Rule
COLUMN 3: Replace
COLUMN 4: Extra options
COLUMN 5: Checkbox (enabled)개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨Example Url is required because it forces people to test their redirects before sending me emails complaining about something not working. It seriously reduces my email a lot :)
I have no plans to add any more features to this addon, or do any major changes to it. It's basically just in maintenance mode now. - Does not work correctly with nested brackets.
For example, if you want to eradicate youtube playlists, you'd better locate &list parameter and rebuild the URL without it.
Rather than identifying all parameters for careful string composition.
E.g.
(https?://)?(www\.)?youtube\.com/(watch\?)?((&?v=[^&]*)|(([&#]t=([\d]*h)?)([\d]*m)?([\d]*s?))|(&?index=[\d]*)|(&?list=[^&]*))*
has nested parentheses which are not parsed correctly by this extension.
I'd propose to use
(https?://)(www\.)youtube.com/watch\?(.*)(&?list=[^&]*)(.*)
with this replacement
$1$2youtube.com/watch?$3$5
This way parameter &index= will remain, but won't have any effect.
And the result will be removal of &list parameter which I am talking about. - 5점 만점에 5점Charles Kong 님, 9년 전I'm running this with FF v50 32-bit. Works great! I use it so 2 more URLs end up at 1 to eliminate duplicate entries in LastPass. (For example, http://10.1.2.3->http://realhost and http://alias->http://realhost. Then, save only a login entry for "realhost".)
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 12616240 님, 9년 전Not much to say about this, other than it works, and works well. Seems to be exactly as powerful as it needs to be.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 10353549 님, 9년 전This was a great addon but it doesn't work on Firefox Developer Edition 51.0a2. Although Developer Edition may not officially be supported but does anyone know a solution for this?
Updated on Nov 8:
Hi Einar, thank you for your reply and I'm sorry that the above behavior may have been because of my configuration issue. This addon works fine on Firefox Developer Edition 51.0a2.개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨This addon is barely supported anymore. Once 51 gets released I'll try to fix it if it still doesn't work. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 5974346 님, 9년 전Used it to force firefox to use port 8080 instead of 80 for a specific site. At first it seemed to work alright, but then I saw that when submitting form data it doesn't perform the redirect.
- 5점 만점에 3점Firefox 사용자 12521647 님, 9년 전The latest version available when updating is 3.1.0 (updated on August 5 2016), which isn't working with FF 48.0 (redirection rules aren't saved).
Update:
Found out what's causing the problem. The addon "RequestPolicy Continued 1.0beta12.3" prevents Redirector 3.1.0 from working properly.개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨Are there any errors in the Browser Console? I'm using 3.1 on FF 48 without problems. - 5점 만점에 1점wigga_whambo 님, 9년 전When I go to create a new redirector, the Save button is greyed out. Should I use an older version that's compatible?
개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨It's grayed out until all necessary fields have been filled out and the pattern matches the example url. - It does not work in the last days on Firefox 48 + Redirector 3.1.0.
Not saved settings redirects.