Shinigami Eyes에 대한 리뷰
Shinigami Eyes 제작자: Shinigami Eyes
Firefox 사용자 17727821 님의 리뷰
5점 만점에 5점
Firefox 사용자 17727821 님, 5일 전리뷰 1,349개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19809155 님, 4일 전the 1-star reviews complaining about transmasc and intersex people getting marked red fail to consider WHY they get marked red (hating trans women)
- 5점 만점에 1점mystieneko 님, 6일 전lots of false flags, intersex people and trans men are almost always marked red while transmisandrists are marked green
- 5점 만점에 1점thevdsasff 님, 7일 전used to use this religiously after it first came out and at first it was genuinely useful. now after discovering i'm intersex i try to go to any community for the topic anywhere and everyone is marked red because our discussions of gender and sex don't 100% align with the mods views (which then gets called transmisogynist, when nobody is saying anything of the sort at all). this includes a disproportionate number of transfems, so the claims that simply being transfem will get you marked green are false. i have, however, seen people get marked within days of making an account somewhere *just because they are posting in intersex spaces*. so do with that information what you will. i personally never plan on using the extension again, i'll vet people myself
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19803232 님, 7일 전Abysmal tool if you genuinely care about safety from transphobes. There is a mountain of examples where people who spew intersexist, exorsexist and antitransmasculine hatred 24/7 get to secure their "safe" marking while painting their trans siblings who won't stand for that as the real transphobes.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 17409768 님, 9일 전This extension- as many others have already pointed out- is no longer accurate or curated in any shape or form. I've used it for many years now, and I just keep catching false flags, especially on tumblr. Not worth the download in 2026
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 17939446 님, 10일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Glossopetrae 님, 11일 전
- 5점 만점에 3점Spider-Man 님, 11일 전I wish there was a way to see why someone is marked as pro or anti trans. Like a quick description "Posts hateful comments on twitter" or "Regularly Advocates for trans rights during live streams"
- While at times very good, the community-sourced data on tumblr is prone to bad information from TERFs, false flags from petty infighting, and racism. Often, a trans-friendly and specifically transfeminine blog will be removed by community flagging for having affiliated with any other blog that does not subscribe to specifically radical transfeminist theory. The review process simply cannot keep up with the type of flagging system it has. I also still have concerns over how in the past, attempts to flag exorsexist and otherwise 'truscum' blogs were thrown out, and concerns about exorsexism as a form of transphobia were dismissed for potentially muddying the water in flagging transmisogynists. I'd honestly rate this app at a 3 were it not for its claims of being concerned with transphobia or anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments as a whole, when many reviewers and users will tell you that the extension was always only intended to report transmisogyny.
- 5점 만점에 4점OscineAves 님, 16일 전Despite what other reviews will say there's very few false positives or false negatives if you're a regular person engaging in regular circles.
It won't be a problem unless you engage in chronically online discourse, in which case you can easily use your critical thinking skills to determine for yourself whose on your side and change them to green for yourself. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 19304457 님, 16일 전on a lot of websites it seems fine, but its completely useless for tumblr. anyone supporting trans men gets marked red.
I don't know why other reviewers are saying this is false, I guess they don't use tumblr? - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19132200 님, 16일 전
- 5점 만점에 1점DuskTheUmbreon 님, 24일 전I've used this extension for years. It's been pretty useful, but lately the flaws have become too rampant to ignore.
A large number of people have been mistagged, with rabidly transphobic authors being marked as trans-friendly (often due to them having been reasonably trans-positive in the past) and people who aren't reasonably able to be described as bigots being marked as transphobic. Of note is that r/XenogendersAndMore is still tagged as transphobic, which is an issue that has been known for years and hasn't been fixed.
This leads me to believe that this extension simply isn't being maintained at all. Any kind of review process that may have once existed clearly no longer does. I'm not sure if it's because the developers got overwhelmed, or just abandoned the project, or whatever, but it appears that there's just no accuracy checking occurring anymore, outside of sheer mass of reports.
Given that, I can simply no longer recommend using this extension. With a lack of any kind of maintenance, quality checking, or anything else to ensure that tags stay accurate, it is far too open to abuse and will likely continue to decline in usefulness. - its far from flawless. but its nowhere near as bad as the low reviews make it seem; it remains one of the most useful extensions i have
important note: its extremely important to remember that some people may be transphobic but attempt to appear trans-friendly on the surface, which is what the review-bombings are getting wrong (it seems they rather burn down a useful tool then accept that trans people can still be transphobic, even if coated in progressive language). - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19769542 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19767867 님, 한 달 전it's been co-opted by racists to put down black trans women who speak up about white trans women fyi.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 18165305 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14185535 님, 한 달 전It still works mostly as intended. Green links can be hit or miss but red links are accurate 100% of the time in my experience. The 1 star reviews are just mad people are actually starting to get called out on their transmisogyny.
- 5점 만점에 1점CrimsonCinnamon 님, 한 달 전