Stylus에 대한 리뷰
Stylus 제작자: Stylus Team, Jeremy Schomery, tophf
리뷰 1,206개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13801775 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13790902 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13785391 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13778055 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점darvishalone 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Franklin Yu 님, 8년 전GitHub as a real bug tracker is really great. It’s important to get feedback about bug report.
- 5점 만점에 3점Firefox 사용자 12235071 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Stonecrusher 님, 8년 전Opensource, actively developed, great features and it works! Much better than the original Stylish (now bought and "developed" by data collection company).
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 12315754 님, 8년 전
개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨We can't fix what we can't reproduce.
Please post a screenshot and an instruction how to make it happen.
And if you use FF 56 or older, please re-check it in a new browser profile with no other addons installed because in the old Firefox the full (classic) addons can affect WebExtensions.- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13608986 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점RedSquanch 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13604918 님, 8년 전Actually great (five stars), but suddenly - without playing around or doing anything - ALL my styles disappeared. Srsly, it has been fucking much time I spent into optimizing everything...
€: After restarting FF, everything is like before again. Consequently, went from 2 to 4 stars...개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨Styles can only disappear due to a bug in the browser or disk failure. Stylus simply doesn't have the code to mass-delete the styles on a whim.
Always export the styles manually on the styles manager page if you don't have a system-wide periodic backup set up. In the future we'll probably add an internal database backup and external sync. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13402379 님, 8년 전It's a good alternative to Stylish. Just because it's opensource.
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13603596 님, 8년 전Does not seem to work with containerized sites. FF57 with Mozilla's own Multi-Account Containers extension. Otherwise, thanks for the effort.
EDIT: Works when following workaround on github, although this way is rather primitive.개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨Mozilla's implementation of Containers API is incompatible with some of the basic approaches we use for speed-up like direct access to the background script. Either the API will be fixed in the future or we'll try to rework our code.