IPvFoo에 대한 리뷰
IPvFoo 제작자: Paul Marks
Firefox 사용자 13029084 님의 리뷰
5점 만점에 5점
Firefox 사용자 13029084 님, 8년 전Being very interested in the IPv6 adoption, I like to see if a page is really using IPv6, IPv4, or a mixture.
This extension shows if IPv4 or IPv6 is used just by looking at the extension icon: the big number is for the server on the address bar, the small number(s) showing if components of the page were served by IPv4 and/or IPv6 servers. (Some IPv6 pages are driven by components on IPv4-only servers. For example, my credit union has a dual-stack main page, but all its online banking is IPv4-only.)
Click on the IPvFoo icon, and every server is listed, and whether it is secured, whether it's cached, and (usually) the IP address. It's all presented in a very nice table.
The only shortcoming I have seen so far is if some components are cached from activity on another tab so a server isn't accessed by the current tab, the IP address of that server wont' show; but a "refresh ignoring the cache" (Ctrl+F5) fixes that, at least for the current page. (I hope a future version would resolve the IP address in this situation, but I think it's 5-star-worthy even as it is today.)
Overall, I am very glad to see IPvFoo here for Firefox 57+. I first came across it when I was using Chrome and in Chrome I have absolutely no reservations in recommending IPvFoo!
This extension shows if IPv4 or IPv6 is used just by looking at the extension icon: the big number is for the server on the address bar, the small number(s) showing if components of the page were served by IPv4 and/or IPv6 servers. (Some IPv6 pages are driven by components on IPv4-only servers. For example, my credit union has a dual-stack main page, but all its online banking is IPv4-only.)
Click on the IPvFoo icon, and every server is listed, and whether it is secured, whether it's cached, and (usually) the IP address. It's all presented in a very nice table.
The only shortcoming I have seen so far is if some components are cached from activity on another tab so a server isn't accessed by the current tab, the IP address of that server wont' show; but a "refresh ignoring the cache" (Ctrl+F5) fixes that, at least for the current page. (I hope a future version would resolve the IP address in this situation, but I think it's 5-star-worthy even as it is today.)
Overall, I am very glad to see IPvFoo here for Firefox 57+. I first came across it when I was using Chrome and in Chrome I have absolutely no reservations in recommending IPvFoo!
개발자 답글
2년 전에 게시됨I finally fixed the caching problem in v2.11, by keeping recent IP addresses in RAM. This fills in the gaps when Firefox reports a request without an IP address.
리뷰 40개
- 5점 만점에 5점vertigont17 님, 4달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 17087931 님, 일 년 전
- For those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul! - 5점 만점에 5점Rodolfo R@mírez... 님, 3년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16855318 님, 4년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점takeshi0303 님, 4년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13845156 님, 4년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16393218 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Abdul Rauf 님, 5년 전This should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- 5점 만점에 5점Marcone C.A 님, 6년 전