Firefox Multi-Account Containers에 대한 리뷰
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 제작자: Firefox
Steve 님의 리뷰
I just love what this extension does, preventing cross-talk between activated Container tabs! There is one, rather large, caveat, however, in that when initially setting up a URL in a designated Container, it easily completed, and it looks like you're done! BUT... the next time you use that URL (say you Bookmarked it), you are presented with a Container verification screen, where you have to say, "Yes, I actually DO WANT to use the Container that I thought that I already HAD set up!" What this means is that once you setup a URL to a Container, you have to immediately TRY that URL (possibly Bookmarked) to answer that verification page. THEN...everything works as expected. I consider it an inconvenience, but once you are used to jumping thru the hoops, its 2nd nature. And that does not detract from the purpose or function of the extension!
리뷰 7,881개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14991062 님, 하루 전Works well for my use (on a single machine). I haven't used the sync-option! Other reviews report it is buggy...
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 15356034 님, 하루 전
- 5점 만점에 4점fabioescolastico 님, 2일 전Ajuda muito quem precisa acessar vários de logins diferentes, mas a sincronia tem problemas.
- 5점 만점에 1점majesticmini 님, 7일 전It was miraculous to use, but Mozilla does not care to develop or run anything without illegal corporations telling them what to do. Who agrees? Is the Internet not a conspiracy?
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13835821 님, 8일 전Irresponsible to have this extension published and available with such dire bugs. Whatever you do, DO NOT turn on Sync for this extension. You'll end up wiping out your entire configuration, your containers, your site rules, everything.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14515734 님, 9일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19625591 님, 11일 전
- 5점 만점에 1점0x666c697473 님, 13일 전Guaranteed to silently drop containers in the middle of your workflow, with no github interest in even acknowledging the problem.
- 5점 만점에 3점Sean Critz 님, 15일 전This extension needs some work before it fits the concept. In situations where multiple accounts need to be managed on the same website (using multiple microsoft accounts for different clients, for instance) , it is generally not usable. The following workflow breaks it:
- Open tab in X container, login to a service
- Service uses redirects to authenticate, container extension grabs those redirects and loses the container status or changes the container status, breaking the login flow or putting a different login into the context
Additionally, there does not seem to be an option to remove a site from a container preference, once added. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14376762 님, 18일 전Works well for seperating my tracked internet history, without needing to setup a second Firefox Profile & Mozilla Account. This in addition to the Facebook, Google & Twitter Containers help keep those 3 from tying everywhere I go on the 'net to my accounts.
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13252902 님, 21일 전Really helps at keeping some of the problematic sites contained. Could use some polishing but very useful addition.
- 5점 만점에 3점Mackintosh´s 님, 23일 전Please change environment bonds to Deep Links instead of only Top Level Domains. Ask whether the container should always open up when the current deep link is opened or whenever any site of the top level domain is opened.
- 5점 만점에 4점ChosenFate 님, 한 달 전This is great in concept, however, the friction kills it for me. After adding a site to a container, whenever I now open a link of that site, I get asked whether I wanna open it in that container. Of course I do, I mean, I manually added it to that container. This only needs to be done once per site, but it's still unnecessary friction that just about tips it over to "more pain than gain" unfortunately. Please make an option to always open a given site in it's container no matter what
- 5점 만점에 5점Chinmay Rajyaguru 님, 한 달 전This is very powerful tool for productivity. I shifted from Chrome to Firefox a week ago.