Firefox Multi-Account Containers에 대한 리뷰
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 제작자: Firefox
리뷰 5,972개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14602598 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점sudip mandal 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점snvalalnn1 님, 5년 전
- As an IT person at an MSP, this extension is invaluable. It allows me to logon to O365, Azure, and many other services for multiple customers without having to use private browsing/incognito mode or constantly logon and logoff to switch accounts. I have several tabs for each customer and it's super convenient. Along with the Container Tabs Sidebar extension, I have easily shaved 20 minutes off of the time I spent switching accounts every day.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14463164 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14647867 님, 5년 전ITS AWESOME to organize your stuff but it could be better with a history of each container separately and shortcuts for new tabs in a specific container (for a more productive environment, i am not vim freak ;) )
- Wonderful idea! Possible improvements: having history divided by container, so it is possible to delete a container's history. Also possibility of deleting a specific container's cookies. Would be great if there were more "built-in" containers for popular sites, just like the Facebook container. It would be nice to implement the same link functionality as the Facebook container: when a link is clicked, if it goes to a website not in the container, it is open by default in the default container.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14294505 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16111917 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Jonathan Beckett 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Eduardo Augusto Coleta de Souza 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점yyamashita 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16102662 님, 5년 전
- Good stuff. Agreed with another review - don't really need a warning. Now that the basics are down (excellent add-on!), I'd like for some enhancements. Basically, you know why I'm using the extension, so perhaps offer to automatically containerize popular websites (offer container packages). I think I'd like to be able to put every site in its own container, too, unless this would obliterate performance. Thank you! :)