Firefox Multi-Account Containers에 대한 리뷰
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 제작자: Firefox
리뷰 946개
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13462441 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15111151 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15107735 님, 6년 전Tento doplněk mi přijde úžasný. Narozdíl od jiných doplňků, které mají zajistit soukromí a znemožnění stránkám vás sledovat je zde jasně vidět, co dělá. Bohužel je zde ještě spousta práce, kterou je potřeba udělat, aby si zasloužil 5 hvězdiček. Synchronizace mezi zařízeními je nutnost - nebudu trávit hodiny času učením prohlížeče, jakou stránku zavřít do jakého kontejneru opakovaně. Pak by bylo fajn mít nějaké UI na úpravu nastavení - např. mít možnost vypsat si stránky, které patří do jakého kontejneru by jistě ušetřilo práci proti současnému řešení, kdy člověk musí stránku otevřít v daném kontejneru, označit jako 'Vždy otevřít' a pak nejlépe znovu načíst, aby toto nastavení potvrdil.
Jen tak dál vývojáři! - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13222348 님, 6년 전Really nice add-on but I will put 5 stars if you add the "hide container eye" directly on each line of the container's list ; improvement for hiding with only 2 clic. Thank you.
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15089368 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 12845422 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15067940 님, 6년 전Very nice but it is annoying to ask twice to remember the website assigned container by default. Why?
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15066544 님, 6년 전Great for privacy, great for multi-account access. Does what it says on the box.
To improve:
- Remove the "Open this site in your assigned container?" step, it's completely unnecessary. I've already said I want it, so do it.
- Allow (specific) extensions to work across containers, because I have to re-enter my LastPass password every time I open a new container, which is annoying.
- Ability to sync container config with Firefox account, for multi-device access.
- Ability to edit containers more efficiently, much like one would bookmarks. I'd like to be able to copy a folder of bookmarks and paste them into a container all at once. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13704328 님, 6년 전Five stars if you save the containers and config for the site on firefox account and sync...
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 14318407 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15059137 님, 6년 전This is a really great extension that makes life much easier managing multiple clients.
What would be helpful in the future are adding key-bindings and synchronisation.
But again, great tool that I now use everyday. Thank you! - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15055667 님, 6년 전It needs sync to be able to be the same containers across all my Firefox installations on all platforms.
- 5점 만점에 4점Philippe Morin 님, 6년 전It doesn't sync. I would like to share the same container types between my computers. I have a Mac and a PC.
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15051914 님, 6년 전Great extension. What keeps me from giving 5 stars is that the keyboard shortcuts need to be mappable. It should be one command to open a container tab.
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15050524 님, 6년 전Very useful indeed! But I did notice a little problem. When I was in my Personal tab and span a child tab (also personal) to a Medium post as anonymous, one of my cpu cores goes up to 100% load.
That happen every time I spanned the Personal tab with this Medium post.
But, when I opened up the exactly same site on a regular tab (also as anonymous), the cpu was just fine.
So, I logged in at Medium in the Personal context, and the behavior was gone.
That happens on a Firefox Quantum in a Linux Fedora distribution. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15041531 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15040706 님, 6년 전This functionality is welcome. What was previously managed with multiple browser accounts can now be managed with only one (provided I use the same add-ons).
A few things that would make its initial and possibly regular use more convenient in my case, mainly different ways to sort websites into a container and make it defualt.
--ability to import bookmarks and bookmark folders so that they defualt to a specific container.
--ablity to sort "current tab" and "all open tabs" into a specific container when clicking on the add-on icon
--had minor issues with [are you sure you want to open this site in this container by defualt] message where it was sometimes unresponsive (I added an entire bookmark folder to a container and opened all at once) I mostly had to wait and reload before confirming.
--The ability to generally avoid/disable the [do you want this to defualt to this container] without individually using the [rmember for this site] setting might be welcome.
Consideration: if I'm already in a particular container and link to a site that would normally use a different container I would most likely not want it to instead remain in the current container or have me decide, unless in the defualt container. If the [remember for this site] option is not selected the message does serve that purpose but it's not useful when opening bookmarks. So implementation may have to be complicated or have to allow for various rules that are dependent on the current container. - 5점 만점에 4점Lukeskyweb 님, 6년 전Muito útil este add-on...
Seria perfeito se pudesse ser utilizado algumas ideias do add-on chamado "Temporary Containers", pois ele e meio difícil de entender .
Obrigado Moz & Dev's !!! - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15028093 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 14552945 님, 6년 전This is a great idea, as are containers generally: isolation much like virtual machines, but a level higher (above OS) so with much less overhead.
This particular app works well but is frustrating in one respect: you cannot specify to open a site in container X in future without already having done so. As it is, you must first re-open your site in a preferred container, then choose to always do so as a second (manual) step.
Even so, this app provides cross-site isolation. I feel much better having all my banking in a container no other apps see.
I accept Facebook tracking my tastes & movements as a fair exchange. If you don't, use the Facebook Container app but get this one anyway, for everything else. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15024706 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15023970 님, 6년 전Sometimes "Always open in {container}" doesn't respond. It seems like "Always open in Default" never works.