NoScript Security Suite에 대한 리뷰
NoScript Security Suite 제작자: Giorgio Maone
billdehaan 님의 리뷰
5점 만점에 4점
billdehaan 님, 8년 전I've loved it for years. The new look takes a bit of getting used to, but the functionality is still there.
For those who are complaining that they lost settings after restarting Firefox, when you first click the "Trusted" field, you're only setting it temporarily. That's when the clock icon is still big. Click it a second time, and the icon becomes smaller, and it's permanent. It's not very intuitive, but once I figured it out, all was well.
I do have one question/problem. Having configured a lot of sites, I wanted to back up the settings. In the settings page, there is Import/Export/Reset. The Import pops up a dialog, but the Export doesn't. I don't want to hit the Reset and lose all my settings, for obvious reasons.
Is there something else I need to do in order to export the settings? Or are they being exported to some default location? I'm running 10.1.5.8, and the export button is there, but clicking on it doesn't seem to do anything that I can tell. I've looked at noscript.net, but I don't see any description other than the generic feature description. Could something be conflicting with the export?
For those who are complaining that they lost settings after restarting Firefox, when you first click the "Trusted" field, you're only setting it temporarily. That's when the clock icon is still big. Click it a second time, and the icon becomes smaller, and it's permanent. It's not very intuitive, but once I figured it out, all was well.
I do have one question/problem. Having configured a lot of sites, I wanted to back up the settings. In the settings page, there is Import/Export/Reset. The Import pops up a dialog, but the Export doesn't. I don't want to hit the Reset and lose all my settings, for obvious reasons.
Is there something else I need to do in order to export the settings? Or are they being exported to some default location? I'm running 10.1.5.8, and the export button is there, but clicking on it doesn't seem to do anything that I can tell. I've looked at noscript.net, but I don't see any description other than the generic feature description. Could something be conflicting with the export?
리뷰 2,383개
- 5점 만점에 5점jordan9543 님, 3일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18218075 님, 5일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Shannon Sobeck 님, 8일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19072847 님, 10일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy 님, 14일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19088604 님, 15일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19072892 님, 22일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점cwqing1973 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 14468519 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점rabbitshee 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19047433 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점A. Bilmanda 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Lazer Bear 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 15056996 님, 2달 전issues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 17847461 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18989716 님, 2달 전
- I really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript.