Tampermonkey에 대한 리뷰
Tampermonkey 제작자: Jan Biniok
리뷰 247개
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12905438 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 6208066 님, 8년 전Doesn't do anything. Even when enabled sites still detect ad-blocking and try to prevent it.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13937278 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13937217 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13808209 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Andrey Korzh 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13742023 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13606670 님, 8년 전
- There are no obvious ways to actually install scripts, except copy-paste into editor (except File/Import on "Utilities" tab, which turns out to be for configuration rather than user scripts).
The support site doesn't quite work (has a frozen pop-up on top), but what shows gives Chrome specific instructions.개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨> There are no obvious ways to actually install scripts
Script installation works by loading URLs that end up on ".user.js". This can be done by clicking a link or manually entering the URL. You can also drag and drop files ending up on ".user.js" to Firefox. Finally you can use the "Utilities" tab, enter a URL at the "URL" section and click "Import".
> The support site doesn't quite work (has a frozen pop-up on top)
Do you have JavaScript blocked/disabled i.e. via NoScript?
> but what shows gives Chrome specific instructions
This is on my TODO list. However, many answers apply regardless of browser in use. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13437159 님, 8년 전There is really no excuse for having one's addon obfuscated. In fact, Tampermonkey is the only addon I know of that deliberately obfuscates its code! That brings the question: what are the developers trying to hide and why?
If you don't want anybody else to fork your extension, just release it under a restrictive custom license, and everybody will be happy. There is no way somebody could abuse such a license and benefit from it. So we'll be looking forward to a release w/o deliberate obfuscation!개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨> That brings the question: what are the developers trying to hide and why?
Either there is nothing hidden besides the concrete implementation or neither the Mozilla Add-on review team, nor the Opera extension review team, nor the Windows Store team did their job.
> There is no way somebody could abuse such a license and benefit from it.
In a perfect world: yes. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13434058 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점jorge121valdes 님, 8년 전Whenever i do a change, i must wait like 5s until i can continue writing (this happens if i stop writing for like 1 second), it's imposible to make things with this lag, hate it totally
개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨Please try to disable the internal linter:
"Config mode" -> "Advanced" and then disable "Automatic syntax check on typing"
If this doesn't help you can also try to disable the option "Highlight trailing whitespace".
Config mode -> Advanced, - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13325508 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13334636 님, 8년 전Doesn't work at all in the latest Firefox Beta for Android. Or Firefox for Android in general.
A shame, because it's flawless if executed in a desktop PC. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12960771 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13113484 님, 8년 전
- After having upgraded my distribution from Rosa R8 to Rosa R9, some functionality in google plus got broken just from having tampermonkey installed. The searchbar, app selector, notification and account pop-ups stopped working and posts could't be expanded or commented leaving only the links on the navigation bar the only thing working, This makes the site unusable.
One thing to note is that this behaviour is not present after a fresh system boot but after reloading the page this starts happening and nothing except a reboot will do anything to stop this with the extension enabled.개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨This should be fixed at the development channel. I've also uploaded a new stable version on 2017-04-11, but review takes very long these days (Queue Position: 144 of 291). Sorry for any inconvenience. 개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨FF 45 has only very limited WebExtension support. Some necessary API which is required by Tampermonkey is faulty or even not there.
That's OK because the WebExtensions API is in an alpha state at this Firefox version, but this causes TM to require Firefox 46 to work. Sorry.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/12/21/webextensions-in-firefox-45-2/- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12390451 님, 9년 전There is no option or way to add userscripts, when I go to a userscripts .is page it doesn't ask to install or anything