Ulasan untuk Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context oleh Wikiwand
651 reviews
- Tahap 4 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 17852983, sehari yang lepas
- Tahap 4 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 16307622, 2 hari yang lepas
- Tahap 5 daripada 5by Ok Google, 10 hari yang lepas
- Tahap 5 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 12391569, 13 hari yang lepas
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Wolphie, 22 hari yang lepasUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.
- Tahap 5 daripada 5by 远离中共邪教快退出党团队, 23 hari yang lepas
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by winphreak, sebulan yang lepasI can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait. - Tahap 1 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 12661639, sebulan yang lepas
- Tahap 2 daripada 5by ShodanV3, 2 bulan yang lepasThey ruined the BEST wikipedia addon with AI. It's bloat now. If I wanted that, I'd just ask AI for info instead of using wikipedia. Please do a lite version without it or something.
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 17046154, 2 bulan yang lepasUsed to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- Tahap 5 daripada 5by Lobélia H., 2 bulan yang lepas
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by StephenM, 2 bulan yang lepasIf I want AI, I'll either build my own local solution with whatever LLM I want for free or go to a website or use a separate app. Wikiwands' entire existence for being is to make the Wikipedia layout easier to read. Nothing else. Don't remake it ever. AI Wand, NOT Wikiwand. Utter JUNK made by JUNK developers, supported by JUNK people.
- Tahap 4 daripada 5by eric guerber, 2 bulan yang lepas
- Tahap 5 daripada 5by 退出党团队远离中共邪教, 2 bulan yang lepas
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Celena, 3 bulan yang lepasThis used to be a good extension, which I used for many years across different browsers and devices. Today I've had enough and I'm going to uninstall it.
Before they started remaking it, it was very good. It was essentially a better layout for Wikipedia with not much else to it, but that's why I liked it. It made it clearer to read, easier to use, and just overall felt like a more updated version of Wikipedia's UI. Combined with an ad blocker, it was perfect. However, since the remake, it is worthless. It is so bloated. The majority of the page is taken up with AI stuff, and it wants you to use it constantly. It has made the layout even more confusing - while before I felt like it was very intuitive and more Wikipedia like, now it's just added so much more junk and confusing elements. Wikipedia is way easier to use.
With this latest update, I'm done. I was already getting frustrated with the way pictures were handled. If you clicked on it, there would be various bits of information that covered over part of the picture. Then there was so much blackspace that it wasn't always that much more visible than in the article. You zoom in and it's barely better. Now, I tried to look at the picture it used for the cover image, which no longer shows up in the sidebar as well. I clicked on it, and it was much the same as it used to be, although the information/other pictures below now fades away. Good! However I tried zooming in, because it was still not a big picture. It not only barely zoomed in, but moved the maybe two pixels bigger image around with my cursor. So now I had a very vaguely enlarged picture of some people that bounced around as I tried to exit out of it. Cool!!!!!! Good thing I never use Wikipedia to look at things like art as someone who enjoys art history!!!
The AI is too much, the paywall is too much, the needing to have a separate account for it is too much. And now they have continued to just make the UI worse and worse. I'm done here. I'm so sad that this has gone this way. I'm so disappointed. They had something good and it's useless now. I'd rather use normal Wikipedia, and that's the first time I've said that in many years. - Tahap 2 daripada 5by Niklas H, 3 bulan yang lepasUsed to be slim, nice and handy, but feels a bit bloated since the remake. The possible settings for UI adjustments are great, however the popup is very annoying to always come back since I constantly use private windows, and Wikiwand won't save any settings, instead asks again every time.
AI features are really unneccessary for me. Just please make it save my settings and not ask again for a login everytime. - Tahap 5 daripada 5by rivrain, 3 bulan yang lepas
- Tahap 5 daripada 5by Meta Williams, 3 bulan yang lepasI've been here 3 min and I've already learned something!
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 17490856, 3 bulan yang lepas
- Tahap 2 daripada 5by Eonir, 3 bulan yang lepasWhen I open a wikipedia article, 70% of the screen is covered by either AI bullshit, or a huge window with new settings, 90% of which are behind a paywall.
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 17143382, 4 bulan yang lepas
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by DS, 4 bulan yang lepasLove how Wikiwand used to be an incredibly useful product that made Wikipedia more readable and now it's... "AI-driven" slop garbage that no one wants or asked for. Yet another product "improving" itself right out of usefulness. What a waste.
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 17984040, 4 bulan yang lepasShoves GenAI garbage down your throat and the pop ups blocks half the screen. Also sells your data. Just go use something like Modern for Wikipedia
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Pengguna Firefox 14774990, 4 bulan yang lepasGreat design, but ruined by first having AI shoved in my face and now ads everywhere. Back to classic Wikipedia.
- Tahap 1 daripada 5by Steedlan, 4 bulan yang lepasWas great, but the recent changes made the UI awful and turn this add-on into a whole cash cow that is against the principles of Wikipedia
- Too much ads, trying to hide bring to a paywall, adding CSS doesn't worth 5$. Even with an adblock the banner background stays.
- They added an AI that is completely useless and only here to surf on the trend of AIs.
- Talking about ads it requires a Wikimand account despite that Wikipedia already have one
We can't accept an add-on that makes money off Wikipedia