Omtaler for Web Archives
Web Archives av Armin Sebastian
Omtale av KirkH420
Vurdert til 4 ut av 5
av KirkH420, 3 år sidenIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
317 omtaler
- Vurdert til 4 ut av 5av dost, 6 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av frostbyte, 7 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 19173586, 8 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 19114790, 10 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 18905802, 12 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 19145735, 12 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 19128233, 18 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av casi dancasy, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 19096545, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av wertzuz, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Kay, 2 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Kasander, 3 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av selmasoken, 3 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 1 ut av 5av Happy, 3 måneder sidenYou're better off just manually visiting the archive websites. Here's a suggestion, instead of opening a specific snapshot, open the snapshots (or history) page where the user can see (if) different snapshots and play around till they find the one that works. This will reduce the number of times the user gets "No results"
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av BatsRule, 4 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 1 ut av 5av Sione, 4 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Maximilian Grothusmann, 4 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 15254436, 4 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 18866863, 4 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 18248595, 5 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av VaRLoK, 5 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av stop5, 5 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av GothGlamPrincess, 5 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av BillKoochooloo, 5 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av bunnie, 5 måneder siden