Beoordelingen voor Web Archives
Web Archives door Armin Sebastian
Beoordeling door KirkH420
Waardering: 4 van 5
door KirkH420, 4 jaar geledenIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
333 beoordelingen
- Waardering: 5 van 5door ilovemikael, 6 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Jatila, 9 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door GnarlyCmdr, 11 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 1 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19720321, één maand geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Dan, 2 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 17451381, 2 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Jalewood, 2 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 15958710, 2 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Java, 3 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19611278, 3 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19604848, 3 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Anonymous, 4 maanden geledenVery useful. Information should be free for all.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door أبوعلي, 4 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door Ugarov, 6 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 18960744, 6 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Deo, 7 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 1 van 5door Kaqxar, 7 maanden geledenAlas it breaks login pages which use Cloudflare captcha!
I first thought that uBO and/or Privacy Badger are the culprit and disabled those, but then still could reliably reproduce the bug. Then I disabled *ALL* my extensions and enabled them one by one, meanwhile testing logging in. When I turned on Web Archives, login stopped working, I got an error message after entering my credentials and clicking the "I am a human" checkbox on the popup Cloudflare captcha.
Once I disabled Web Archives, login started to work again.
Mind you, this test was done with uBO and PB still being disabled.Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
7 maanden geleden geplaatstI don't see how this extension could break your login page, but if you'd open an issue on GitHub, we could debug the problem together by testing the same login page.
https://github.com/dessant/web-archives/issues - Waardering: 4 van 5door dost, 7 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door frostbyte, 8 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19173586, 8 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19114790, 8 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 18905802, 8 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19145735, 8 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19128233, 8 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door casi dancasy, 8 maanden geleden