Beoordelingen voor Archive Page
Archive Page door John Navas
48 beoordelingen
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 17543614, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Snoozeanne, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door ertpecs, 3 jaar geledenquite possibly the second best add on for firefox, right behind ublock origin
edit 20241126 - this has worked great for years. however some sites have figured out how to bypass our bypass. still a 5 star add on, just hope that something can be figured out for the ones that got froggy - Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 15702693, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Upjohn, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door kcl, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Sterntaler, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Professor Pootis, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Josh, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Barmem, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Sergio, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 6648216, 4 jaar geledenSo simple, so functional. A must-have for the Жеn$оrship-conscious (sorry for the slight paranoia there), as this service, as compared to the 'original' doesn't respond to many tаkedоwns.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door CGC, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Rogach, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 14819659, 5 jaar geledenAbsolutely excellent archival service, don't forget to archive relevant posts today, for they might not be there tomorrow.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Vedun, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door bunnylace, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door TheforbiddenGabe, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 13479481, 5 jaar geledensimple add-on and blazing fast service by archive.today!!
Till yesterday I used archiveror add-on which does the same job but requires 2 clicks. This one is better as it does the job in single click. Also, I prefer this website over all others including wayback, as it provides the url instantaneously and the length of url is short as well. Recently I found out that archive.is can be used as an workaround to read articles behind paywall/registration like NYT and washington post, I don't know how this works but it's like magic!!
Great job by the developers of the website and addon.
My only suggestion is to include an option to open the archive tab in background like in archiveor addon.
Also, I am greedy and I want more !! - please make a simple android app just like this, which can be used by clicking on share button on any app e.g. for twitter app: click share button > share tweet via > choose archive app icon > redirects to default browser with url just like this add-on > https : // archive . today/?run=1&url=
Edit - Developer has responded so promptly and clarified that this feature already exists! 10/10Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
5 jaar geleden geplaatst1. Options are available to control how the new tab is opened, foreground (active) or backgroound (inactive). Open Manage Extension and then Options.
2. The companion Android app is Share2Archive, available in Google Play. - Waardering: 5 van 5door worst, 5 jaar geledenSo it would seem I'm the second user to install this add-on and the first user to review it. How exciting!
The current behavior when you click the icon is to check whether the page is archived, and if so it sends you to the most recent snapshot. If not, a snapshot is automatically taken of the page. This is pretty foolproof as archive.today already asks if you want to take a new snapshot if a snapshot exists and is older than 5 minutes, so there's no need to include a separate snapshot button.
The one thing I would change is to include an option in the settings to disable automatic submission for snapshots on click, as I can imagine a webdev or some similar case where a page that shouldn't have been uploaded ends up archived accidentally via misclick or whatever.
Keep up the great work John!Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
5 jaar geleden geplaatstThank you. I'm trying to keep this simple and foolproof for regular users, so I'm reluctant to do anything that might make it more complicated, and I don't think there's much extra load from mistakes, but if you give me more details of what you have in mind, I'll give it serious consideration. Thanks again.