Beoordeling door Lampe2020
Waardering: 5 van 5
door Lampe2020, 7 maanden geledenI don't know why this isn't core functionality in Firefox and why this extension isn't among Mozilla's "Recommended" either.
This extension is an immediate improvement, because I now have a much easier time understanding source files that I open in Firefox.
Some slight changes for this to be perfect would be to enable autodetect by default and to choose a more contrasty colour scheme by default (Qt Creator Light/Dark maybe) so the highlighted text doesn't fade into the background.
This extension is an immediate improvement, because I now have a much easier time understanding source files that I open in Firefox.
Some slight changes for this to be perfect would be to enable autodetect by default and to choose a more contrasty colour scheme by default (Qt Creator Light/Dark maybe) so the highlighted text doesn't fade into the background.
17 beoordelingen
- Waardering: 5 van 5door MP3Martin, één jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 13571266, 2 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Mohammad Banisaeid, 2 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door yazpower, 2 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door Davide, 3 jaar geledenSo it only works for RAW files, not on the pages itself, is that correct?
Thank you :-)Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
3 jaar geleden geplaatstYes, that's correct: raw files (with a few exceptions that won't work, those on raw.githubusercontent.com being a notable one).
We could technically inject the library code to colour elements on regular pages, but I wouldn't really know what to colour exactly, it depends too much on the page. Doing all `` blocks could be a thing maybe, or we could imagine adding a feature to selectively colour a block, but there's nothing of the sort supported by the add-on at the moment. - Waardering: 5 van 5door OM_RA, 3 jaar geledenIt does the job, although I wish it could work in the source code of web pages.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Vedun, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 16892439, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 3 van 5door weiss, 6 jaar geledenNot bad, but doesn't work on github RAW files, so it is pretty much useless for me :( Anyway, a custom scheme import functionality would be nice.
Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
6 jaar geleden geplaatstThanks for the feedback, and sorry to hear that about the GitHub raw files :(. In case you haven't seen it already, there are explanations about it here [0].
For the color schemes, I'm relying on the schemes providing by highlight.js. I don't really have the motivation for adding an “import” feature (but would possibly accept a PR). I'll file an issue to acknowledge and keep track of the request, though.
[0] https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/8 - Waardering: 4 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 14068156, 7 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door slazil, 7 jaar geledenOverall is excellent ext!
On note. Settings for autohilite and other one are not saved, so I must click 'autodetect' each time.Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
7 jaar geleden geplaatstThanks for using the add-on, and for your feedback!
If the settings are not saved, this is a bug, I'll try to investigate. Any chance you can tell me about your OS and Firefox version, please? Here or on this GitHub issue: https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/9 - Waardering: 4 van 5door enderandpeter, 7 jaar geledenI thought it was missing PHP, but it was just not in an obvious place. There's an initial list of what I guess are commonly requested languages and then suddenly it's an alphabetical list. Maybe the whole thing should be alphabetical for such a long list.
Antwoord van ontwikkelaar
7 jaar geleden geplaatstThank you for the feedback!
The library that is used by the add-on makes a distinction between a set of “most-common languages”, and all other languages it supports. For technical reasons, this add-on initially supported just this restricted set of languages. When I added all the other ones (including PHP), I appended them to the list. So in fact this makes two alphabetical lists: a first one with the “most-common languages” (as presented by the library, I'm not actually trying to classify languages here), and a second one below, with all other languages.
I understand that this might be confusing. Maybe I will change it in the future. Ideally, I would like to implement an option to switch between the complete list of languages, or just the restricted subset. One advantage would be that auto-detection goes much faster when the library is compiled for fewer languages…
Anyway, thanks again! - Waardering: 4 van 5door Ludwig, 7 jaar geledenWorks. However, the settings could be better. It's hard to find a good, bright color scheme without a quick preview.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 13189945, 8 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 12504175, 8 jaar geledenThanks for the update to the new framework!
- Waardering: 5 van 5door jalcine, 8 jaar geleden