Vurdering for 'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video)
'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video) av code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Vurdering av Firefox-brukar 19242234
Vurdering: 1 av 5
av Firefox-brukar 19242234, 5 månader sidanThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 4 månader sidanHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We could also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).
827 vurderingar
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Roman, 18 timar sidanLike some users after installing this extension the fan was overworked with noises. HOWEVER, on closer inspection the issue was likely caused by having the in extension adblocking feature turned on while another adblocker (e.g. uBO or Adguard) was already in use. Simply put, when it comes to - Youtube - adblocker, use either the one within this extension or uBO/AdGuard/Ghostery etc. but never both or more.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av glitch0id, 6 dagar sidanI wanted the comment section on the right side of the page next to the video and was able to get this done using this extension. Absolute slam dunk.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19661049, 8 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Milan, 8 dagar sidanCaused widespread lag and high fan usage. Required uninstalling, multiple reboots, and a system restore to resolve.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 7 dagar sidanno, please read below.
"Reviews tend to display herd behavior, while to product is complex and hard to judge. The amount of daily uninstalls is low. This project is updated by many volunteers. There might be a mystery bug only affecting 0.1% of users or 1% of Firefox version users - worth discovering, but depending on you writing a bug report." - Vurdering: 5 av 5av Shidoshi Gizmo, 9 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Raeseti, 11 dagar sidanGreat to begin with, but if you start going through your subscriptions it will bog down and break. And it turns out that the developer doesn't understand that not everyone who installs the extension is not their personal bug report.
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av DisplayName, 11 dagar sidanAdd on makes youtube unusably laggy.
And yes developer this is what reviews are for. They're for leaving information for others about the experience of using the app. "Makes the website it's for unusably slow" is useful information for other users. This isn't a technical or bug support request. It's a review of the functionality of the app.Svar frå utviklaren
posta 8 dagar sidanReviews tend to display herd behavior, while to product is complex and hard to judge.
The amount of daily uninstalls is low. This project is updated by many volunteers.
There might be a mystery bug only affecting 0.1% of users or 1% of Firefox version users - worth discovering, but depending on you writing a bug report.
I meant Mozilla has rules generally allowing to flag / remove this. - Vurdering: 1 av 5av Firefox-brukar 16192357, 14 dagar sidanToo bad, the options are very relevant, but this extension makes YT unusable: depending on the chosen options, the YT window freezes. Calculation, settings, or others, we don't know what's happening. I don't quite understand the number of positive reviews, as I don't have such an exotic setup (FF 146.0.1 + YT Anti-Translate + Privacy Badger + Ublock Origin + Emoji CheatSet on W11x64).
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 12 dagar sidanno. (reviews are not for this). If there is aynthing, please join the bug report discussion/s https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22z%20FireFox%22
thanks - Vurdering: 4 av 5av Firefox-brukar 16501371, 23 dagar sidanThis extension works but seems to make the site laggy
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av MA AL ISLAMIYAH UTERAN, 25 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 13605519, ein månad sidanGreat replacement for the defunct "Enhancer for YouTube" extension
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Firefox-brukar 13581270, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av faze, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av adalisse, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19607381, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Illuminator, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 12156575, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Greg, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19533654, ein månad sidanFinally, an extension to block those pesky and pointless shorts and member only content that actually works. Thank you creators, you truly made YouTube usable again. Love all of the customization as well.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 13868360, 2 månader sidanFinally something that just works and have what I want!
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av runamonk, 2 månader sidanWorking good so far, has all the features I want. Thanks!
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Firefox-brukar 16768472, 2 månader sidanThe performance is very bad and the developer doesn't seem to be willing to fix it. Furthermore some features are missing and the ones that do exist don't work reliable, probably because of the very bad performance.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 12 dagar sidanno. (reviews are not for this). If there is aynthing, please join the bug report discussion/s https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22z%20FireFox%22
thanks - Vurdering: 3 av 5av ytooyama, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av elsenfox, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av MMT, 2 månader sidan