Vurdering for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite av Giorgio Maone
Vurdering av robsku
Vurdering: 5 av 5
av robsku, 6 år sidanI'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2 449 vurderingar
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av ilovefanservice, 2 dagar sidana must have addon for todays bad actors and annoyances
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Shanrya, 4 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19806246, 11 dagar sidanThis is one of the most distinctive Firefox add-ons for me. To be honest, I'm not using it right now because I'm still learning how to use it more effectively. I'm actually trying to learn more about internet security, and I've noticed that using this add-on is great for protecting your privacy from malicious JavaScript. I highly recommend it. Thank you.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Heather, 16 dagar sidanProbably one of the most essential addons for firefox, next to ublock. Great for security but it's recommended to have a tech background cuz the default settings can break many sites.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Rifat, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av noewaeda, ein månad sidanit's an essential extension. without it, using the internet is like walking directly into a warzone.
on the strict setting, it makes browsing slightly more clunky due to having to give websites some trust, but it's usually not that big of a deal. - Vurdering: 5 av 5av Max Rower, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 2 av 5av fidius, ein månad sidanI uninstalled this extension because it randomly started interfering with browsing due to some nonsense swipe-style gesture 'feature'. Used to be a good extension but I'm not inclined to trust it anymore.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19773062, ein månad sidanDue to a bug that effected mobile scrolling, I disabled Noscript for a day and discovered what a horrible experience browsing was without it.
It seems the bug is now fixed, and in record time too. Thanks Giorgio. Fantastic extension. - Vurdering: 5 av 5av Tsuki, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av tt, ein månad sidanNew update gesture feature needs to be removed. Disabling the extention until it's fixed
updating to 5 stars now that gesture feature is turned off by default - Vurdering: 1 av 5av Kval, ein månad sidanRemove gestures or add an option to disable this clunky gesture feature in the settings in the next update. Scrolling is impossible with the current update. For this reason alone, I'm removing this very useful extension for now, until they fix this annoying feature.
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Radosław, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av fcat435, ein månad sidanHad to disable the extension because it prevented me from scrolling on pages.
- Vurdering: 2 av 5av Firefox-brukar 12969656, ein månad sidanDitch the gesture on mobile function and will be a 5* extension again.
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 13428877, ein månad sidanI use it a lot and it has been a great tool but had to drop the rating after the new gesture system has been added since for a while I had no idea it had been added and it has made browsing a complete hell on mobile because it can't be disabled so I will have to disable the app until then.
- Vurdering: 2 av 5av Vee, ein månad sidanWas good, but the new gesture system is horrible and makes scrolling on mobile more trouble than it's worth.
This should have never been implemented silently in the background without an option to disable, to begin with. No idea what the dev was thinking.
Had to disable Noscript on mobile until it's fixed. - Vurdering: 5 av 5av Ivan, ein månad sidanThe whole gesture idea thing. First, accessing the settings in Firefox android is the same number of ui interactions once the new ui layout is learned. Second, Imagine if another extension did what you decided to do (the whole Old New Thing "Imagine if two programs did this"). Third, I cannot believe your awesome extension can still be Mozilla recommended after this. 🙁
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Firefox-brukar 18205130, ein månad sidanNow, when I accidentally hold down on the screen, the selection randomly appears. It turns out this extension is to blame. How can I disable it? I can't find anything in the settings. Please give us the opportunity to remove this "gesture".
- Vurdering: 2 av 5av Firefox-brukar 17307430, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Oi you, ein månad sidanI'd rate this significantly higher, but 13.6.3 added some annoying gesture nonsense on mobile that's bloody inconvenient and doesn't have any obvious off switch.
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av xorek, ein månad sidanWas great, but now there is an annoying gesture function I cannot disable. Trying to browse and a slight movement to the corners on the left will start drawing. I have a disability that causes finger twitching, so this idiotic feature constantly activates. New features should always default to off. Review from android phone. Edit: Downgraded to a previous version worked at least. Still keeping 1 star because of this stupid decision to not have a toggle. Way to not care about people with disabilities...
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Firefox-brukar 18210165, ein månad sidanThis new gesture "feature" (more like a bug) really ruins things. Put it back how it was.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19770324, ein månad sidanThank you for making the gestures optional again, this extension is back to being awesome!