Vurdering for Port Authority
Port Authority av Hacks and Hops
Vurdering av Brother Charles
Vurdering: 3 av 5
av Brother Charles, eit år sidanThank you, ACK-J - this little extension works well. However, I've only rated it 3 stars because sometimes it proves to be a somewhat counter-productive annoyance. This plugin really, really needs a "whitelisting" option. For example, I can't log in and use box(dot)com and a couple of other sites/services that I use to backup my files online, unless I remember to temporarily disable 'Port Authority'. Please add a whitelisting option - that will make it a fully 5 star extension.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 5 månader sidanThank you for the feedback, Mozilla just approved PortAuthority v2.0.0 which added the whitelist (gear icon). Enjoy!
51 vurderingar
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av HaydenF16 Pro, 19 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Claudiu, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Korwin, ein månad sidanIt is not clear how to add a domain to the exceptions? The only input field adds the domain to the "PortAuthority Blocking" list. Had to disable due to the inability to use the extension with a local network application web interface.
Port Authority 2.1.0
Mozilla Firefox 140.0 (64-bit)Svar frå utviklaren
posta ein månad sidanA large update (v2.2.0) is waiting for approval from Mozilla and should be out in a few days with a fix to this problem - Vurdering: 5 av 5av Ysmir, 2 månader sidanThis is a very niche issue that I have encountered, if you have a proxmox server deployed and you have this extension in the browser you use to access it you cannot connect to any console sessions within it, you also cannot connect to the server shell. You will receive undefined (code: 1006) as a error with a TASK ERROR: command '/usr/bin/termproxy 5901 --path /nodes/proxmox --perm Sys.Console -- /bin/login -f root' failed: exit code 1. And if you follow that code like I did all you will find is something about a node being offline, which was a bit of an issue for me as I never had a node to begin with.
- Vurdering: 4 av 5av - l _ ll _ lll _ llll _ lll _ ll _ l -, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 18966150, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av MauGx3, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av gamer, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av ronnie722, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av DrCodfish, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av thevoid, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Kyro, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 18959301, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Bartosz Kaźmierczak, 3 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av akasico1, 4 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 4 av 5av Rufous Potoo, 4 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Michael Steven Kwashnak, 4 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 2 av 5av Absy, 4 månader sidanIt's cool but I can't open links from browser to app anymore, nor does it actually add any domains to the whitelist when I try to allow them to bypass.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 4 månader sidanHey, sorry to hear that. Would you be able to submit a bug report on the GitHub for me so I can look into it? https://github.com/ACK-J/Port_Authority/issues
Edit: This issue has been resolved - Vurdering: 3 av 5av simlock, 4 månader sidanDoesn't ublock origin do the same with the filter list "Block Outsider Intrusion into LAN" enabled?
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Kevin Hannahs, 4 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 4 av 5av 行走的西瓜皮, 7 månader sidan