Análises de Suíte de Segurança NoScript
Suíte de Segurança NoScript por Giorgio Maone
Análise de Usuário 13551624 do Firefox
Avaliado em 2 de 5
por Usuário 13551624 do Firefox, há 8 anosIt is a real pitty that you do not seem to want to listen to the incredible ammount of people who are trying to tell you that you messed this up.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 8 anos"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2.422 análises
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Usuário 14609268 do Firefox, há 5 diasWhile this is an incredibly great app for granular control, it is the OPPOSITE of its "with no loss of functionality" mission. This is the #1 go-to source of browser errors that I am constantly troubleshooting and it takes HOURS of time sifting to figure out what to tweak because it provides no help when it breaks something (like a search box)--you just have to go on a lengthy trial and error quest one by one to figure out which of 30 sites to trust to get a search bar working and by that time I don't remember what I was going to search for. So you end up just globally trusting everything and that defeats the whole purpose.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Usuário 13935566 do Firefox, há 14 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Pompan, há 17 dias
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Maximilien Perron, há um mês
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 18127040 do Firefox, há um mêsТакие прям зайки и лапочки... Разместить закрытие окна приветствия и "Пожертвовать" чуть ли не с наложением друг на друга. Эдакое "Ну, даааааайти деняяяяяях!". Звезда в минус.
Аддон классный, но не нужно быть, как эти. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 19664008 do Firefox, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 19487299 do Firefox, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Ryan Steed, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por ZeroUnderscoreOu, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Dzluck, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Bob, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por mlatpren, há 3 mesesIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por zekromVale, há 3 mesesThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Hopeavirta, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Lazy Cat, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por sumobunny, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Zelgadis-San, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Dadou, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por aq, há 4 mesesUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Simon Bünemann, há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por ADKFZ8O, há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Marw, há 4 meses