Análises de Greasemonkey
Greasemonkey por Anthony Lieuallen
1.271 análises
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 17969148 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17966133 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17953571 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por hobbymizwan, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17898091 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17892732 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avoid like the plague.
I used Greasemonkey before version 4, but ever since the webextensions were forced after Firefox 57, GM never got back to where it was previously. They tried to force new APIs without any backwards compatibility which was a terrible decision, and other decisions were made which were ultimately the downfall of this addon. And now it hasn't been updated for years...
It's just sad what happened to this once awesome addon.
Install another extension such as Tampermonkey instead, it's a billion times better than this. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 15074904 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 16763674 do Firefox, há 2 anosWARNING LOT'S OF SCRIPTS WON'T WORK USE OTHER ADDON LIKE TAMPERMONKEY OR VIOLENTMONKEY. Review for version 4.11 now 31 months old. It refuse to install some scripts and that will get worse because firefox evolves. On top of that I wrote a local script. Grease monkey validates the name but use it own name. ( unnamed script 123455 ) and that can't be changed. When I made a seccond script I couldn't be saved beccause "unnamed script name space is in use. This addon should be removed because script writers are dependent on it and this one has become a disgrace.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Michael1990, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17837933 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 16253516 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17806605 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 17789996 do Firefox, há 3 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Danyal Saeed, há 3 anos