Análises de Web Scraper
Web Scraper por webscraper.io
Análise de xBB
51 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por BurninLeo, há 2 mesesGreat handling ... at least, if you're used to CSS selectors.
There's only one important thing that cose me hours to find out. I did not find that in the documentation or the quick start guide.
If you want to scrape page recursively, than the top-level-selector(s) - whatever they are - must not only have "_root" as parent, but also the link-selector that you defined to select the subpage. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Trần Nam Tuấn, há 2 mesesVery good when I have batch download multiple entries.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por darkvision, há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 13486076 do Firefox, há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Allief, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 18151135 do Firefox, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 16779275 do Firefox, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Tejaromlius, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 13976503 do Firefox, há 9 mesesThis is about the worst usage documentation for an extension I've seen since 1998. All I wanted to do was basically create a site map of a non-ecomm website. This is a perfect example of people who know their app inside and out, not looking at it from the viewpoint of the user. When certain elements don't show up the same in a user's situation as they do in a no-sound video, it's confusing and incomplete help. I'd give it a zero stars if I could because it's worthless without a more clear training. Over-simplification is not always good.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18431104 do Firefox, há um ano
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por RavieShellback, há um anoI'm Encountering an Error while Creating or Importing Sitemaps. The Error "No available storage method found"
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por David Saylor, há um ano
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoI just did a test. It is working. Please provide more detailed description with steps to reproduce the problem on https://forum.webscraper.io/- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18168765 do Firefox, há um ano
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18115266 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18031132 do Firefox, há 2 anos