Análises de Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context por Wikiwand
Análise de Fatyanoor Ashfa
Avaliado em 3 de 5
por Fatyanoor Ashfa, há 4 anosI don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.
667 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 19114790 do Firefox, há 4 dias
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Sciky, há 10 diasThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Indiana Moon, há um mêsIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Usuário 19063414 do Firefox, há um mêsWikiwand was great, but now it's infested with AI popups, ads and the constant bugging to make an account. A shame because it used to be a great tool, now it's more work to click all the nonsense away.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 14503325 do Firefox, há um mês
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 19040033 do Firefox, há 2 mesesUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 14706773 do Firefox, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Ally Simy, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 19035698 do Firefox, há 2 mesesEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por LCM, há 2 mesesThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17979558 do Firefox, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Milan Regec, há 2 mesesAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 18996590 do Firefox, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Toccetness, há 2 mesesAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 17669402 do Firefox, há 3 mesesAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por marii, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 17852983 do Firefox, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 16307622 do Firefox, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Ok Google, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 12391569 do Firefox, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Wolphie, há 4 mesesUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.