Análises para CanvasBlocker
CanvasBlocker por kkapsner
Análise por ©®°˜
100% unique mean that is not really natural, canvas should not be unique but changed in order to be natural.
Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
Is like you said you have a device that never exist.
To better understand how this work :
Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.
On default settings may make it pass the google test.
For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.
Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easy
Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
Is like you said you have a device that never exist.
To better understand how this work :
Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.
On default settings may make it pass the google test.
For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.
Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easy
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 8 anosPlease open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss this. AMOs rating comments are too limited to have a good conversation.
One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.
One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.
474 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19712217 , há 13 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19708899 , há 14 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por ProActress20 , há 19 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por JERD_ME , há 25 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19654712 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Leviii , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19544944 , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19173908 , há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Saint.77 , há 4 mesesOne of the essential plugins for everyone that care about anonymity when you surf on the web. If you stay on one of the 2 lowest settings you can increase your anonymity dramatically on the web without breaking functionality, so you can surf the web pretty much like everyone else without even noticing it while still staying hard to identify if you for example combine this with VPN. This alone will help but its one of several other key plugins you should install to shield yourself against tracking on the web.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Lilith D. Bracken , há 4 mesesGreat privacy-focused extension that helps protect against fingerprinting. It blocks or fakes the data that websites use to track your device without your consent. I like that you can customize how strict it is for each site, so if something breaks, it’s easy to adjust. It runs quietly in the background and doesn’t slow things down. A must-have for anyone who cares about online privacy and wants more control over what sites can learn about their system.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19490358 , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Edgar Almeida , há 5 mesesSeems to work, if you test it at browserleaks(dot)com / canvas with the plugin on, keeps giving new signatures at each refresh, if you turn the plugin off, the signature will remain the same
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por 魔王 , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Kal , há 5 mesesDoesn't seem to work. Visited the EFF page (coveryourtracks.eff.org) to check fingerprinting and no luck.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Zertrax , há 5 mesesWorks very well. If you want to test this addon whether it works or not, just visit the page which is mentioned in the description. (for example: browserleaks website)
It's just a shame that I only recently discovered canvas fingerprinting, even though it's been around for so long. Keep your privacy up folks. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por whatever , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por VOIIIXI , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por CHANO , há 7 mesesI became suspicious when there is no tally count, so I went to coveryourtracks.eff. ran the fingerprinting scan and found the app was doing absolutely nothing at all but sitting in my browser collecting info.I will be removing it.And running a system malware scan.