Análises para Greasemonkey
Greasemonkey por Anthony Lieuallen
1292 análises
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Andrey Dogadkin , há 9 anosEverything was good until the authors decided to go with backwards incompatible changes for v4. There are lots of user scripts which are not going to be updated in a timely manner (or even ever). Personally I can not support a decision to be progressive at the expense of the end users. And considering the presence of mature and steady alternatives to Greasemonkey I don't see any reason to stay here.
Все было в порядке до тех пор, пока разработчики не приняли решение сделать версию 4 обратно несовместивой. Существует множество пользовательских скриптов, которые не будут обновлены своевременно (или вообще когда либо). Лично я не поддерживаю решение быть прогрессивными за счет пользователей, и, с учетом существования надежных альтернатив, не вижу причин оставаться на Greasemonkey. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13493863 , há 9 anosJe l'apprécie mais, il manque l'extension AntiGameorigin v6 afin d'avoir les statistiques et les modules sur OGame !
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12167225 , há 9 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13486539 , há 9 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13486165 , há 9 anos
- Besides questionable decision to go with incompatible changes, was it really necessary to make WebExtension version FF 57+ only??
With current FF mess the only reasonable option is to keep FF 56 while slowly upgrading extensions or searching for replacements. - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13481780 , há 9 anosI give it 2 because I ever love GM so much (even help report bug here and there in the past) but I can't bear current version.. really now it just 0 star. The main programming design rule is backward-compatibility. There's none for GM. If you're some basic script 'user' this is ok if all of your few script owner update script. But for developer current stage is really bad. There's no local script setup even drag-drop file not work. There's no visible local storage script directory so I can junction it to my cloud directory and sync between each PC or easy access the script manually. You can only download someone script and edit it as many user point out. The 2 stars for some user to give it a try because I ASSUME it can still run new script installed from web which write for it.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13479968 , há 9 anosIm playing grepolis. since upgrade, i cannot zoom in/out in the game end the wall isnt counting for losses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13479418 , há 9 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Bayonetta_Lover , há 9 anosI'm glad it works well for me on Firefox 57.0! It gets the job done when I wanna use a userscript on my Firefox browser such as webm-looper-userscript :)
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13477612 , há 9 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13477396 , há 9 anosIt's efficient and quiet and reliable. The process of adding new scripts isn't the most clear, but otherwise you don't even feel it.
- Userscript addon that forgot the ability to add custom userscripts? Added breaking changes to API but in order to modify my userscript to make it work again, I had to download someone else's userscript from a website then edit it and paste my script over it because there is no "Add script" button anymore. I'll fix the changes but be asking all of my users to switch to TM.