Análises para NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite por Giorgio Maone
2370 análises
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13853249 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por asmwarrior , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14083114 , há 7 anosthank you ! very useful and must-have extension for max security
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14325950 , há 7 anosI have been a continuous user for more than 8 years. Initially I needed security support when accessing financial data on the web. More recently I have referred to and taken action from NoScript warnings when visiting a much wider range of sites. NoScript has never let me down!
Thanks must go to Giorgio and his team for his impressive app. Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anosJust FYI: "unlimited storage" permission is needed by NoScript in order to persist your settings, and more specifically your permissions list which may become very large. Anyway, the full source code repository (with all the changes history) is available here: https://github.com/hackademix/noscript
Hope it helps you stop conjuring theories about the intentions of this extensions.- Avaliado em 5 de 5por digitalcircuit , há 7 anos
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anosCouldy ou please report with more details here? Thanks! https://noscript.net/forum- Avaliado em 5 de 5por George Thomas , há 7 anosOne of those "must-have" add-ons. You really need this even if you think you don't
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14114271 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12950286 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14298576 , há 7 anosFirst off, I've used NoScript for a number of years and have donated and am hovering between 2-3 stars due to the terrible UI.
Unfortunately the UI remains extremely poor, with confusing wording and very bad icon designs (w.r.t usability, nevermind esthetics). The UI uses double negatives, which is bad (ref: MS and Apple). This may be a side effect of Italian translation.
There is not differentiation with colour: blue and red are used in the icons regardless if something is "safe" or "unsafe". The exclamation mark doesn't work that well for conveying meaning (it's "sort of" a warning, but then the "stop sign" is also used - but now the stop sign means, "stop restricting" (again - double negative))
E.g.
S!: disable restrictions (change icon. to, almost anything, change wording to: "Allow everything (including blocked scripts)")
!: disable restrictions for this tab (change icon to almost anything else, change wording to: "Allow everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)")
Clock!: Set all to temporarily trusted (change icon, "Temporarily Trust everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)" )
Clock + Stop symbol: revoke temporary permissions (change icon, wording to "Normal operation"?) - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14292288 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14295093 , há 7 anosThis is the best addon for Firefox!
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14250674 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14290478 , há 7 anosModule efficace et indispensable avec une interface très intuitive et esthétique depuis Firefox Quantum.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14287774 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14284504 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14283637 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Jimmy Montano , há 7 anos
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anosThe "privileged pages" are those which WebExtensions cannot have access to, i.e. a bunch of about:xyz pages, plus the domains listed in this about:config preference:
extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains
Anyway using this as a discussion forum is not a good idea. Please report your reset issue (and bring other discussions, if any) at https://noscript.net/forum, thank you!