Análises para NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite por Giorgio Maone
2449 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13509806 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13509796 , há 8 anosI understood the previous version of NoScript.
I do not understand this version. It is not clear what is going on, or what the icon colours mean. Red versus green seems to be disconnected from permitted and not permitted.
I need documentation. The alternative in the latest version of FireFox is uMatrix, which I have on one machine. It is Very Complicated, but I did find complete documentation for it.
To use NoScript 10.1.1 or later I must have documentation. - Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13509040 , há 8 anos3 stars becauze of new Quantum firefox UI, before it it was just perfect, now it is just pure-brainfuck. I will welcome that weed which was smoked while making this nature-fatal-error UI. oh, and TOR still keeps old-fashined perfect UI <3
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13508642 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13508459 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12674645 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13508328 , há 8 anosI am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - Avaliado em 4 de 5por Reindl Harald , há 8 anosthe android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13507805 , há 8 anosThe old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13507402 , há 8 anosNew addon for Firefox Quantum is bad. Why is log.js open always. I always get 1.000 notification on console and it takes more CPU usage. New interface is worse than old one. I can't understand which domain is blocked or allowed.
I want old interface an system back. If you can't do same. Do it similar. Or work with good interface designer. I don't want to delete this add-on.
I hope you can fix all problems soon. - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13507242 , há 8 anosHey guys, even the new gui is not comfortable as it used to be and so on...please consider this as a free addon and how much time is needed to update it concerning the new quantum firefox code - just give it some time and a fair chance instead of bashing around - giorgio, please go on with your good work, so we can all benefit from noscript again
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13507221 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por photografx , há 8 anosThank you very much for your effort to make this work with "Quantum (57+)".
But please give us back some oft the ofunctionality and ease of use of the old version.
e.g. temporary allowing scripts
cheers - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13167791 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13507030 , há 8 anosActually a 5*, it might be language related but in germany the translations are way to long for the new interface (Words don't fit in the reserved space).
Sadly it looks really bad.
For the other stuff I like the uMatrix like way to control what gets loaded.
Also, even thought I need to look how it works somewhere, that we got some https contol looks promising. - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13506606 , há 8 anosthis version is too complicated to handle for me. I am not the read-a-long-guide-before-doing-anything-complicated guy, so I am missing simplicity and intuitivity. I loved the former versions.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13506290 , há 8 anosYESS ! Available for Firefox 57 !
Thank you.
This Add-on is a must have !
It allows you to browse the web securely. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12641543 , há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13364029 , há 8 anosDidn't work with https://www.rnz.de/ (no Pic) and it isn't opssible to login here at my Mozilla Account and my googlemail account works only with simple HTML with noscript active.
Update 28.11.17 - Good Work! Now everything is fine. - Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13505686 , há 8 anosIt's not as functional as the original, and it took a while to figure out how to temporarily allow a script. You have to click twice on the trusted icon. The bottom line is it still works.
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13505627 , há 8 anos1). As a regular NoScript user unfamiliar with code/script-related stuff, I must say this update is less UN-intuitive than the former and a bit more straightforward —still not a marvel in signage, indeed, but it never was, and seems it plays its role.
2). Mr. Maone is not obliged to respond to rude demands for his free, voluntary add-on. Those childish users calling us "bootlickers" hopefully will go away after another "better" (if possible) add-on, or even better, come with an improved one themselves.