Análises para SingleFile
SingleFile por gildas
Análise por Utilizador do Firefox 15950945
Avaliado em 3 de 5
por Utilizador do Firefox 15950945 , há 5 anos Good idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
943 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por OverLordGoldDragon , há 12 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18702861 , há 21 diasI rarely give reviews but this one I must. It worked out of box. Can do things even FireShot can't such as saving the page or portion of it in a single html file! Very useful for saving a website or web page on Internet Archive.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por stackingcows , há 23 dias
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18935224 , há 23 dias
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18921230 , há 24 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Lurker , há 25 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Chiral , há 25 diasОчень полезное расширение и отзывчивый разработчик. А то стандартный инструментарий сохранения страниц уже давно нормально не работает с современным вебом и блокировщиками рекламы. Особенно полезное приложение в условиях, когда всякие уважаемые органы то и дело стремятся модерировать интернет, защищая граждан от информации, например, по починке устаревших серверов (не пытайтесь понять эту серию эвфемизмов на иностранном языке, это бессмысленно :) )
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Omar Dejesu Orrantia , há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18586968 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18892610 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por VaRLoK , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por AnarchyWolf , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18860237 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Trainor , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Richard Liu , há 2 meses