Para utilizar extensões do Android, irá precisar do Firefox para Android. Para explorar o Firefox para extras de computadores, por favor visite o nosso site para computadores.

Iniciar sessão
Ícone do extra

Análises para User-Agent Switcher

User-Agent Switcher por ntninja

4,3 estrelas de 5
5
382
4
77
3
38
2
18
1
39
554 análises
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13331399 , há 8 anos
    This add-on should be perfect if there is an option that allows me to select websites to switch user agent.

    For example, I have a following list: "facebook.com, youtube.com". And I want the add-on to only change the user agent when I surf these website. Websites that aren't in the list will not be affected by the add-on.

    Could you do it?
  • por Alex , há 8 anos
    Needs custom color setting for the menu, or a global day/night switch. I'm using dark dev theme and this is what addon's menu looks like.
    https://i.imgur.com/XHGScCv.png

    P.S. Don't have gitlab account and I'm not a developer myself, so can't test xpi. Firefox 59.0b9 64bit, dark dev theme, win 10 with dark theme.

    Resposta do programador

    publicado a há 8 anos
    Hmm… Looks like you are being bitten by my workaround for dark themes there…

    Could you please test this quick test hack and see if it works better in your case:
    https://storage.ninetailed.ninja/index.php/s/uvvqFd6oPIhNFzB

    Also please state which operating system, desktop environment & browser version your are using. If applicable also add information about your system desktop theme.

    To respond please open an issue on https://gitlab.com/alexander255/user-agent-switcher/issues as I will not receive any notifications when you update your review. Thanks!
  • por MetaG[8] , há 8 anos
    Fortunately found this working replacement for random agent spoofer; works as advertised, nice UI, a couple more user agent strings to choose from would be nice (for both privacy and debugging purposes), but all in all great job
  • por kcufuoyeid , há 8 anos
    The recent update that lets us organize ua is a great addition. The simplicity to edit is superb, the copy and paste makes it easy to quickly update user agents. The UA sticks between restarts. beats the hell out of the ugly and confusing interface of UAS and it's bloated xml files.

    I think the only feature now I would request would be to assign a user agents to a website e.g:
    visit google.com -> spoof as Chrome
    visit bing.com -> spoof as Edge

    Resposta do programador

    publicado a há 8 anos
    Hi! Thanks for your feedback!

    Although I do not currently plan on adding per-site User-Agent switching, it would still be very helpful if you could outline some details on how you would expect such a feature to interact with the rest of User-Agent switcher. I'd be particularily interested in UI mockups and user stories (short step-by-step descriptions on what exactly you would expect to do [in terms of interaction with the extension] in order to achieve your goal). Please add any feedback to the existing issue:
    https://gitlab.com/alexander255/user-agent-switcher/issues/4

    Thanks!
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13288811 , há 8 anos
    webextension + multiprocess = good. Works as expected. Thank you.
  • por Joe Nicolas , há 8 anos
    Works perfectly. It's pretty easy to add custom UA. So easy to use, simple UI and pretty powerful. All stars I'll give to you for your hard work. The new random user agent feature just make this addon even more powerful. And dev is pretty helpful, if you ever encounter any issues or maybe just want to send feedbacks, just post it on the gitlab (http://bit.ly/2wpyVdR) and he will help you as soon as he can. Keep up the great work, dude!
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13150673 , há 8 anos
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13280490 , há 8 anos
    Easy to use
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13280490 , há 8 anos
  • por Tangenta , há 8 anos
    Brillian fork, brilliant. Keep up the great work, mister.

    Resposta do programador

    publicado a há 8 anos
    Thanks! :-)
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13130518 , há 8 anos
  • por Newt , há 8 anos
    This addon is easy to use, works well, and is kept (mostly) up to date with browser releases. I appreciate the option to add custom UA strings, and to modify the default ones.
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13227516 , há 8 anos
  • por eriador , há 8 anos
    I was looking for a WebExt-compatible alternative to user agent overrider. This one is perfect! Thanks for your work
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13181387 , há 8 anos
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13131619 , há 8 anos
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13131619 , há 8 anos
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13152505 , há 9 anos
    That every time I have a problem with the following link this always helps
  • por PERCE-NEIGE , há 9 anos
    Best one I've used so far, but the interface becomes messy if I want to add a lot. Please, dev, find a way to add the entries I want, and to check the box if I want them to show, and when I want to. And a way to add easily common new user agent without searching for hours on the internet, and fix the icon, I don't know if it's possible to make it multi-process.

    I've used it with the entries found on: www.techblog.willshouse.com/2012/01/03/most-common-user-agents and tested here: www.whatismybrowser.com and here: www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/user-agent

    Resposta do programador

    publicado a há 9 anos
    Damn! AMO, cuts off my response each time – you can find ti here instead: https://gitlab.com/alexander255/user-agent-switcher/issues/2#note_34583563
    It would be nice you could respond with a comment to that issue as well.
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13132197 , há 9 anos
  • por UNDP.IQ , há 9 anos
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13110883 , há 9 anos
    Good add ons
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13109461 , há 9 anos
  • por Christiane THELL , há 9 anos
    Bin neugierig was dieses Add on macht und kann.
  • por Utilizador do Firefox 13095048 , há 9 anos
    edit: Settings bug was fixed. Thank you.

    Resposta do programador

    publicado a há 9 anos
    Thanks for your feedback! This has been fixed in the next version (1.0.4), that should hopefully be reviewed in the next couple of days.