Análises para DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection
DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection por DuckDuckGo
244 análises
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13343953 , há 3 anosUsed to recommend DDG to people and used it myself for years on all my devices. I have now switched to Brave everywhere. Privacy AND anti-censorship.
There is a false dichotomy that being anti-censorship means being Alex Jones 2.0. This makes it easy to dismiss people's complaints
Facebook censored a peer-reviewed articled published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the most respected medical journals. Lack of transparency for how something is branded "fake news" is worrying.
The most respected newspapers promoted the "WMD in Iraq" years ago. But I guess propaganda machine is cool when brown kids are killed instead of those bought by rich couple abroad (see news of kids from paid surrogacy stuck in Ukraine).
I am sure an underpaid intern knows better about what is disinformation and what is true. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por || BeeBee || , há 3 anosDuckDuckGo used to stand for Internet privacy. You ask us "Why You Should Care" ... guess you are right as it turns out the you don't care much no more since starting to censor search results. You have just lost my confidence reveling that you have become a player in the great narrative. Shame on you guys!
- I used to really like DuckDuckGo but it joins the elite club of censoring.
The best way to fight disinformation and propaganda is to demistify it, argue it, present it and talk about it, analyse it and present the reality. This is not what DuckDuckGo seems to value. They would much rather down-rank searches from Russian media than let people forge their own opinions on the reality at hand.
A search engine taking party in a conflict is not just a political issue, but a poor sign that the search aspect only responds to what the owners of the engine want you to easily find rather than to leave you with an unfiltered list of what you are really looking for.
Currently, DuckDuckGo's search effectiveness on controversial topics now prove to be similar to that of Google's, with a little bit more privacy powdered onto it. Not exactly worth using anymore, and I certainly don't think they are trustworthy for quality searches if they do things like that. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17015801 , há 3 anosI took it off on my computer and smartphone as I don't need a second Google. I don't need someone to tell me what I should look at.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17325015 , há 3 anosGabriel Weinberg, CEO, decide for me what I should and shouldn't be able to find when I'm searching for things.
If I wanted to be censored I would use google.
so, I'm out. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17324263 , há 3 anosBIG TECH FAR LEFT CONTROLLED- NOT TO BE TRUSTED ANYMORE, DELETE
- You must think humans are dumb for not being able to discern from disinformation. But censoring it for a PR stunt on twitter is just ridiculous. I bet $50 only 1/100 Duck Duck Go users support this decision. It doesn't make much sense, unless you actively want to destroy your integrity and shill for twitter. This act is repulsive.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por DerLinuxminzige , há 3 anosI was a conviced user of DDG until I read this morning: (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/duckduckgo-updates-search-engine-will-penalize-sites-associated-disinformation)
I chose my information and not any duck - if so I could use goggle. Firefox should delete the support for DDG and offer us an other trusted alternative. I installed Qwant for now as I do not see any other trusted searchengine.
I am OUTRAGED by this trust breaking action of DDG. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Maximilian , há 3 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 15979466 , há 3 anosThis project started out with so much hope. But now this CEO also thinks he knows better than all of us and can manipulate the way we think and the information we see. AVOID THIS ADD-ON.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 15242125 , há 3 anosCompany is turning into Google. Only allowing you to see what they want you to see and blocking what they don't agree with.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Txn Aussie , há 3 anosNo different than Bing, except Microsoft is collecting your data. Now that they are censoring, I will go some where else. The only benefit you get now is privacy, but with bing I can get the censorship and be paid in Microsoft points, so the search engine doesn't have a purpose, as I left big tech to avoid censorship and get privacy, I'm moving to Brave search, presearch, SearX and Yacy.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17323215 , há 3 anosi used Duckduckgo as an alternative to google for so long, Today i heard your censoring websites and for that I will be deleting and moving to Brave.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17322617 , há 3 anosIs there no browser that will let me make my own decisions about what is good/bad information? I don't want other people making the decision for me. This was a terrible decision on DuckDuckGo's part. The two majors sales bullet points that differentiated DuckDuckGo from Google was a) you searches would be private and b) your searches wouldn't be censored. Well that didn't hold up well did it?
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17183981 , há 3 anosCensoring searches, you may as well use google. For everyone looking for an alternative I have heard Brave search is good. I am going to try that.