Análises para Tab Stash
Tab Stash por Josh Berry
Análise por Utilizador do Firefox 18831450
Avaliado em 1 de 5
por Utilizador do Firefox 18831450 , há 5 meses Extremely disappointing, youd think if you opened a groups of stashed tabs there would be an options to open it is a tab group, as I thought is implied in this sentence "Restore individual tabs, or whole groups of tabs, with a single click". Also just breaks when you try to import a stash with a file that doesn't exist on the current computer, hoped for some error handling especially when I had the option of not loading the tabs when they're unstashed. Long list of features but for my use case it isn't any different than firefox's sync, just more cumbersome.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 4 mesesUnfortunately Firefox itself does not offer a tab-grouping feature today, so the best any extension can do is track groups only within the extension.
Sorry to hear about the issue with import, please feel free to open an issue on GitHub and I'd be happy to look into it further.
Sorry to hear about the issue with import, please feel free to open an issue on GitHub and I'd be happy to look into it further.
547 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19188203 , há 17 horas
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 15372598 , há 2 diasTab Stash is amazing. It's really useful for what it does: keeping your bookmarks organized. I’d kindly suggest an improvement—a backup system or export functionality
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 11 horasThanks for the kind words! I have good news, which is that there is already built-in export functionality. You can find it in the main menu or in the menu for any folder.
You can also use any built-in Firefox features or other bookmarking add-ons to work with the bookmarks in your stash, and Tab Stash will keep itself up to date! So feel free to use whatever bookmark backup tool works best for you. Resposta do programador
publicado a há 6 diasThanks, I'm really happy you like it! A Chrome port is unfortunately very unlikely, because Tab Stash uses a lot of Firefox-specific things. Also, I am not a Chrome user, so wouldn't be able to provide good support for it. But it may happen one day, I won't say "never". :)- Avaliado em 5 de 5por frostbyte , há 14 dias
- Be ye forewarned... do not jump right into this or any other open tab manager if you have a lot of currently opened tabs that you expect the extension to help you sort out.
My fault really, but intending to just look around, I hovered & then clicked to stash on a filtered selection. Not seeing a way to pause, cancel or undo; I could only let it run. How bad could it be?
It not only "stashed" the ~500 tabs from the filtered selection, but threw the other 3200 tabs in with. Then to my horror found that it put every single one of the 3700 tabs into "hidden tabs".
I only learned of this after a frantic race to shut down every other process & service on the machine to free up as much of the 32GB as possible, praying that Fx wouldn't crash.
It finally ended, and after wasting a bunch of time trying to find a solution, have now resolved to spending more time cleaning up the resulting mess than it would have taken without the help of the extension.
Badly needs an Undo. Badly needs Select/Unselect All on filtered lists. There's not even the ability to Tap-Space to keep selecting in a list, it's a slog of one-click-at-a-time. Badly needs a setting to only affect what is selected and don't mess with anything else.Resposta do programador
publicado a há um mêsSo if I'm reading this right, it sounds like you were expecting "Stash all tabs" to stash only the tabs matching the search. That's a fair point; I've made a note to look into this further.
I'm afraid I don't really understand the rest of your post, though, because:
- When Tab Stash hides/stashes tabs, it's not going to use any more resources than before (i.e. your memory usage will stay the same or decrease), so I don't really understand why the rush to free up memory?
- There IS a single-click "undo" for an accidental "stash all tabs", which is to simply unstash the group that was created.
- You can select multiple tabs at once by shift+clicking, just like you would in Windows Explorer or Finder. There's no need to select each tab individually. (And yes, this respects filtering, so you can select an entire list of filtered tabs with one click and one shift+click.)
Anyway, I hope this helps, and if you'd like any more help, feel free to open an issue on GitHub! - Avaliado em 5 de 5por STAR CRIMSON , há um mês
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13313160 , há um mêsI'm sick of this add-on, it lives its own life and constantly refuses to restore the last tabs of the session
Resposta do programador
publicado a há um mêsAfraid I'm not quite sure what you mean here; if you're talking about restoring tabs automatically after a browser restart, that's built-in to Firefox, and not something Tab Stash does. Otherwise, feel free to open an issue on GitHub and I'd be happy to chat with you further to figure out what's going on! - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Aoshi Shinomori , há um mêsI've been a Firefox user since ver. 2 and this is my very first extension review. It's an essential complement to get your bazillion tabs back after an unexpected error or closing the wrong window. Simple and easy to use, thanks Josh!
Resposta do programador
publicado a há um mêsYou're quite welcome! I'm glad you like it. Thanks for the review, I'm honored to be your first. :) - Avaliado em 5 de 5por DD , há 2 mesesI hope I could have found this sooner! I got rid of other browsers for this. Now I can have my tabs backed up without worrying to lose them. So I can watch my content whenever I can. Totally worth it!
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 2 mesesI'm really glad to hear you like it! Thanks for the review! Resposta do programador
publicado a há 2 mesesGlad you like it! Unfortunately a Chrome port isn't likely any time soon because there are some unique Firefox capabilities that Tab Stash uses which just aren't available in Chrome. But I appreciate the interest!- Avaliado em 5 de 5por cehem , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por BasalComet92836 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 16643877 , há 2 mesesThe best tab organizer on the firefox.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19010334 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Davi , há 2 mesesAmazing add-on ! I've found just what I was looking for a long time ! It's a perfect substitute for "Pocket" or "Read it later" add-ons ! And all the tabs are synchronized between devices through bookmarks sync of Firefox !
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Bullfinch , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Melinda Josh , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Hahn , há 2 mesesAbsolutely a crazy good addon that is surely the killer feature of Firefox. I am so amazed how quickly and smoothly this addon can manage 1200+ groups and 36000+ tabs across 20 devices. It's simply unbelievable. Thank you so much for this great addon. Great softwares truly can change people's life in such a positive way.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 2 mesesYou're very welcome, I'm really glad to hear Tab Stash has been helpful! I'm also happy to hear it's performing well for you; that's something I try to pay close attention to. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18997982 , há 2 mesesPlease add flag to create with old folder name when search is active instead of the search terms
>edit
Instead of whatever is typed in search , i would like the option for folder names to be created as in Version 3.1.1
Search terms as folder names are too contitional , restrictive to work without affecting stash organization even more when having to manage numerous diverse tabs
The search terms can be regex , random , short , ever changing etc ; they ignore the how often a new folder is created that can be set in the addon options when the search term is changed ; selecting and chosing to create a new folder will just do the same and can lead to duplicate folders if the search terms remains the same , at least in this case the folder names with 3.1.1 format would not be identical ; now if technically speaking the search term would check not only the topmost folder in the stash root but check all top folders (not sub folders) then it would just stash in a old folder where in this case the outcome wouldn't be desired so theres no avoiding this issue
3.1.1 naming format didn't had those downsides and was simple to work withResposta do programador
publicado a há 2 mesesI'd like to better-understand why this is causing you problems; feel free to open an issue on GitHub and we can discuss from there! - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18996187 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por dodmedium , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18987877 , há 2 meses