Análises para Tridactyl
Tridactyl por Colin Caine, Oliver Blanthorn
Análise por Utilizador do Firefox 14048265
Avaliado em 4 de 5
por Utilizador do Firefox 14048265 , há 8 anos I've been a long time pentadactyl user and like other reviewers here have been evaluating a few alternatives to replace it . So far it seems like tridactyl is the only current one that approaches and has the best potential in trying to provide a pentadactyl/vimperator experience.
Being used to the maturity of pentadactyl, using tridactyl does leave me feeling a bit disabled
- tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
- mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work.
- things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
- tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
- searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
- some keybindings are different from pentadactyl - e.g. `yy` as opposed to `y` to yank the url - arguably tridactyl is doing the right thing but it does mean some investment in unlearning/remapping things.
- a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
tridactyl is still young but has an active community/code-base and I'm sure most of my pains will go away in time. So far it looks like this is the contender I will stick with.
Being used to the maturity of pentadactyl, using tridactyl does leave me feeling a bit disabled
- tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
- mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work.
- things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
- tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
- searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
- some keybindings are different from pentadactyl - e.g. `yy` as opposed to `y` to yank the url - arguably tridactyl is doing the right thing but it does mean some investment in unlearning/remapping things.
- a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
tridactyl is still young but has an active community/code-base and I'm sure most of my pains will go away in time. So far it looks like this is the contender I will stick with.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 8 anosHi, thanks for such a detailed review.
> mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work
I've just added documentation in the betas to explain this better: you need to first set some homepages via `set home url1 url2 url3`. We don't get access to the Firefox ones.
> things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
At least some of that is our fault, and we're looking into it, albeit slowly :)
> tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
That's usually because focus has gone into an iframe, which are pretty fenced off. There's not much we can do about it :(
> tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
> searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
> a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
These are all in progress. `js` is in the beta branch but is a bit janky.
If you need any help, don't hesitate to come into the Matrix channel or IRC advertised on the new tab page and the help page.
> mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work
I've just added documentation in the betas to explain this better: you need to first set some homepages via `set home url1 url2 url3`. We don't get access to the Firefox ones.
> things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
At least some of that is our fault, and we're looking into it, albeit slowly :)
> tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
That's usually because focus has gone into an iframe, which are pretty fenced off. There's not much we can do about it :(
> tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
> searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
> a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
These are all in progress. `js` is in the beta branch but is a bit janky.
If you need any help, don't hesitate to come into the Matrix channel or IRC advertised on the new tab page and the help page.
504 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por happsen , há 18 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Helkin , há 2 mesesGreat user experience.
I just remove default Ctrl-f bind since it is burned into my muscle memory that it’s this to find on a web browser. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Flat, dark and simple , há 2 mesesAmazing extension, only lacking on the theme documentation
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por aaronedev , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por rev0kable , há 2 mesesThis Vim modeled addon has the most features for a power user, it have more of a learning curve than say, Vimium if you want to utilize the additional capabilities.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19545892 , há 3 mesesBrowsing gets faster with this extension however it doesn't enhance firefox to be as good as qutebrowser
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 15962029 , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por mi6 , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19438303 , há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17908336 , há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Rockey , há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19201857 , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por uimk , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Conor , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por rebelyell , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por tyleralbee , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por yesyouken , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por elitesustenance , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por BobTheDeleter , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Chris Fleming , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14956793 , há 7 mesesThe addon is brilliant!
I prefer it to Vimium as 'F' works on tabs where Vimium wouldn't even register them. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por jieran233 , há 7 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19031464 , há 7 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Kassius , há 7 meses