Análises para Web of Trust, MyWOT/WOT: Website Reputation Rating
Web of Trust, MyWOT/WOT: Website Reputation Rating por WOT Services
149 análises
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por The Puzzling Centaur , há 6 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14558700 , há 6 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14388339 , há 6 anos
- While the service this extension provides is indeed very helpful, the extension itself is in dire need of updating. Right now, it slows down Firefox substantially and hangs it up. I have stopped installing it on client's computers and will not be recommending it until this is remedied.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 6 anosWe're sorry to hear that! We made several updates and improvements to solve this issue. If you think differently we'll be happy to hear from you via https://support.mywot.com/ - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14072894 , há 7 anosWeb of Trust CAN'T BE TRUSTED, DON'T USE IT AS U ARE A MOZILLA FIREFOX USER.
https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/web-of-discretion-when-not-to-trust-web-of-trust/
https://mywotlies.wordpress.com/
BLOCK IT NOW.
https://www.mywot.com/ - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14065274 , há 7 anos"Web of Trust Sells Your Browsing History, Uninstall It Now"
LifeHacker.com - https://lifehacker.com/web-of-trust-sells-your-browsing-history-uninstall-it-1788667989 - Avaliado em 1 de 5por SandpaperWasteland , há 7 anosWoT's "Active Protection" actively tracks and links your IP address to what you type on search engines, your web history, then "distributes" (or sells as some websites have warned) this information directly to others.
Taken directly from their Privacy Policy: "When you install and use the WOT app or WOT extension, we also collect from you automatically... Internet Protocol Address...Search engine results page (keyword, order/index of results, link of result, title, description, ads); web pages visited and time stamp of the visit;"
This obvious breach of privacy mingled with the fact that they were caught red-handed in selling it is UNACCEPTABLE. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14038268 , há 7 anosAside from the obvious deception: https://lifehacker.com/web-of-trust-sells-your-browsing-history-uninstall-it-1788667989
We need something that gives expert warnings based on what experts detect, not community as in every person who thinks they know something when in reality they know less than nothing.
Yeah, This addon is bad for multiple reasons. I used it long ago, but one day I decided it was not worth using beyond even the deception above that they did.
PS, duckduckgo removed wot from their engine so yeah... its no lie. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14012454 , há 7 anosThis site almost completely relies on community opinion, and that opinion's honesty, for its results. There is little fact checking done here since anyone can go to their site, enter a web address and rate it without posting a review or logging in. I would be very careful to trust this service's info without manually fact checking it yourself. I know that doing so defeats the purpose for this service, but that's how untrustworthy I think this service is. Anyone (using this service) can give a site a bad rating without it being crosschecked by someone before it's posted. Even if the site deserved the rating or not. A system like this is easily manipulable, and should be taken with the understanding that there is no guarantee for accuracy.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anosWOT does in fact rely on our community for ratings and reviews, but that is our strength. It's not accurate to say that "anyone" can influence a site's ratings. We use a reliability algorithm that only allows trustworthy users to influence a site's ratings, which greatly increases the quality of our ratings. The system is actually built to prevent manipulation like you're describing. Thanks for your review! - Avaliado em 1 de 5por HedgehogInTheCPP , há 7 anosAdditional security, personal blacklist, but too slow and resource consuming.
Дополнительная безопасность, личный чёрный список, но слишком медленная работа и большое потребление ресурсов. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12343667 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Shahnewaz Ahmed , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13801775 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Yassine Daoudi , há 7 anosI can login in the original website, but not the extension, I can't stay connected in firefox and chrome, i can't even login on any browser with this add-on, so, it's a big problem for me .
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13787392 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13772382 , há 7 anosAfter leaving a candid but respectful and cautious review on an alternative health website, my account was blocked.
This health website was safe and offered an alternative treatment that helped me. Nothing in my post was abusive and I included a disclaimer at the end of the review in case anyone mistakenly thought I stepped in something. Bang. Account blocked after 5+ years of use.
Strangely, three negative reviews seething with abusive, foul and specious language were posted against this same health website and its owner. Their accounts were not blocked.
Could these people be in alliance with pharmaceutical companies? Hmmmm..... That was a question and not a direct attack on WOT, in case their staff are feeling a tad paranoid.
Not recommended. I feel WOT are not trustworthy, since they seem to monitor their users' activity in real time and they seem to censor ideas that may or may not be perceived as threatening to certain corporations.
I recommend trusting the reviews found on WOT only if you accept conventional propaganda.