Ca să folosești extensii Android, ai nevoie de Firefox pentru Android. Ca să explorezi extensii Firefox pentru desktop, te rugăm să intri pe site-ul nostru pentru desktop.

Intră în cont
Pictograma suplimentului

Recenzii pentru NoScript Security Suite

NoScript Security Suite de Giorgio Maone

4,4 stele din 5
5
1.736
4
296
3
172
2
126
1
115
Recenzie de către robsku
de robsku, 6 ani în urmă
I'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.

We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.

See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!

Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.

I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.

P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?

P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)

FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2.445 de recenzii
  • de Rifat, 8 zile în urmă
  • de noewaeda, 11 zile în urmă
    it's an essential extension. without it, using the internet is like walking directly into a warzone.

    on the strict setting, it makes browsing slightly more clunky due to having to give websites some trust, but it's usually not that big of a deal.
  • de Max Rower, 12 zile în urmă
  • de fidius, 12 zile în urmă
    I uninstalled this extension because it randomly started interfering with browsing due to some nonsense swipe-style gesture 'feature'. Used to be a good extension but I'm not inclined to trust it anymore.
  • de Utilizator Firefox 19773062, 13 zile în urmă
    Due to a bug that effected mobile scrolling, I disabled Noscript for a day and discovered what a horrible experience browsing was without it.

    It seems the bug is now fixed, and in record time too. Thanks Giorgio. Fantastic extension.
  • de Tsuki, 13 zile în urmă
  • de tt, 13 zile în urmă
    New update gesture feature needs to be removed. Disabling the extention until it's fixed

    updating to 5 stars now that gesture feature is turned off by default
  • de Kval, 13 zile în urmă
    Remove gestures or add an option to disable this clunky gesture feature in the settings in the next update. Scrolling is impossible with the current update. For this reason alone, I'm removing this very useful extension for now, until they fix this annoying feature.
  • de Radosław, 13 zile în urmă
  • de fcat435, 13 zile în urmă
    Had to disable the extension because it prevented me from scrolling on pages.
  • de Utilizator Firefox 12969656, 13 zile în urmă
    Ditch the gesture on mobile function and will be a 5* extension again.
  • de Utilizator Firefox 13428877, 13 zile în urmă
    I use it a lot and it has been a great tool but had to drop the rating after the new gesture system has been added since for a while I had no idea it had been added and it has made browsing a complete hell on mobile because it can't be disabled so I will have to disable the app until then.
  • de Vee, 13 zile în urmă
    Was good, but the new gesture system is horrible and makes scrolling on mobile more trouble than it's worth.
    This should have never been implemented silently in the background without an option to disable, to begin with. No idea what the dev was thinking.

    Had to disable Noscript on mobile until it's fixed.
  • de Ivan, 14 zile în urmă
    The whole gesture idea thing. First, accessing the settings in Firefox android is the same number of ui interactions once the new ui layout is learned. Second, Imagine if another extension did what you decided to do (the whole Old New Thing "Imagine if two programs did this"). Third, I cannot believe your awesome extension can still be Mozilla recommended after this. 🙁
  • de Utilizator Firefox 18205130, 14 zile în urmă
    Now, when I accidentally hold down on the screen, the selection randomly appears. It turns out this extension is to blame. How can I disable it? I can't find anything in the settings. Please give us the opportunity to remove this "gesture".
  • de Utilizator Firefox 13994127, 14 zile în urmă
    Please let us scroll again. Thank you.
  • de Utilizator Firefox 17307430, 14 zile în urmă
  • de Oi you, 14 zile în urmă
    I'd rate this significantly higher, but 13.6.3 added some annoying gesture nonsense on mobile that's bloody inconvenient and doesn't have any obvious off switch.
  • de xorek, 14 zile în urmă
    Was great, but now there is an annoying gesture function I cannot disable. Trying to browse and a slight movement to the corners on the left will start drawing. I have a disability that causes finger twitching, so this idiotic feature constantly activates. New features should always default to off. Review from android phone. Edit: Downgraded to a previous version worked at least. Still keeping 1 star because of this stupid decision to not have a toggle. Way to not care about people with disabilities...
  • de Utilizator Firefox 18210165, 14 zile în urmă
    This new gesture "feature" (more like a bug) really ruins things. Put it back how it was.
  • de Utilizator Firefox 19770324, 14 zile în urmă
    Thank you for making the gestures optional again, this extension is back to being awesome!
  • de Utilizator Firefox 14489384, 14 zile în urmă
  • de Speaka, 14 zile în urmă
    The new swipe gestures make it basically unusable. There is no way to disable this annoying bs
  • de guppy, 14 zile în urmă
    Works great for what it intends to do. But i don't understand why it needs a swipe gesture that makes the logo show up and opens the extension menu if you drag it around enough. I uninstalled it because I kept doing it on accident and there isn't a way to turn this feature off.
  • de Utilizator Firefox 14609268, 24 de zile în urmă
    While this is an incredibly great app for granular control, it is the OPPOSITE of its "with no loss of functionality" mission. This is the #1 go-to source of browser errors that I am constantly troubleshooting and it takes HOURS of time sifting to figure out what to tweak because it provides no help when it breaks something (like a search box)--you just have to go on a lengthy trial and error quest one by one to figure out which of 30 sites to trust to get a search bar working and by that time I don't remember what I was going to search for. So you end up just globally trusting everything and that defeats the whole purpose.