Recenzii pentru Bookmark Dupes
Bookmark Dupes de Martin Väth
Recenzie de către What???
Evaluat(ă) cu 1 din 5 stele
de What???, 2 ani în urmăOne star.
Firstly, it does work if you have time and know how to navigate around the complexity of this extension.
It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
Now, if you have over 13000 duplicates it will take more than 6 hours (with your PC fans whirring) despite the CPU load being at 12%.
Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once. Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
In other words, you can have duplicate urls across many different folders but it won't detect them because it can only scan one bookmark folder at a time. There's no option to scan all folders.
There is no real instructions too and it can be very tricky to use. It's overly complex and needs to be simplified.
Firstly, it does work if you have time and know how to navigate around the complexity of this extension.
It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
Now, if you have over 13000 duplicates it will take more than 6 hours (with your PC fans whirring) despite the CPU load being at 12%.
Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once. Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
In other words, you can have duplicate urls across many different folders but it won't detect them because it can only scan one bookmark folder at a time. There's no option to scan all folders.
There is no real instructions too and it can be very tricky to use. It's overly complex and needs to be simplified.
Răspunsul dezvoltatorului
postat la 2 ani în urmă> how to navigate around the complexity of this extension.
Do not enable "expert mode".
> It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
If it takes more than milliseconds (in average) to delete a bookmark, something is wrong on your system. It might be running out of memory. A more frequent cause for big latencies is that another tool is interfering, for instance another bookmark extension.
> Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once
This is incorrect. The name (path) of bookmarks is completely ignored for detecting duplicates (if expert mode is disabled).
> Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
Two bookmarks are considered identical if their URL is *exactly* the same string. Only in expert mode, you can configure different rules, but this requires that you specify very precisely what you want to consider matching.
> It's overly complex and needs to be simplified
Specifying different rules than identical strings for URLs *is* a very complex problem and can find unexpected dupes especially for apparently simple rules. This lies in the nature of things. That's why "expert mode" is usually not recommended (unless you really understand regular expressions and carefully read the instructions).
Do not enable "expert mode".
> It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
If it takes more than milliseconds (in average) to delete a bookmark, something is wrong on your system. It might be running out of memory. A more frequent cause for big latencies is that another tool is interfering, for instance another bookmark extension.
> Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once
This is incorrect. The name (path) of bookmarks is completely ignored for detecting duplicates (if expert mode is disabled).
> Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
Two bookmarks are considered identical if their URL is *exactly* the same string. Only in expert mode, you can configure different rules, but this requires that you specify very precisely what you want to consider matching.
> It's overly complex and needs to be simplified
Specifying different rules than identical strings for URLs *is* a very complex problem and can find unexpected dupes especially for apparently simple rules. This lies in the nature of things. That's why "expert mode" is usually not recommended (unless you really understand regular expressions and carefully read the instructions).
527 de recenzii
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 16236539, 2 zile în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 19642746, 19 zile în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede jtorrex, 23 de zile în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede SergDom, o lună în urmăВеликолепное расширение! Я перебрал десятка два отдельных приложений (все, какие нашел) и расширений (проверил ещё не все) - и лучшего по функциональности нет. Здесь сочетается удобство, мощь, гибкость настроек, наглядность результатов и компактность кода. Было собрано около 35000 закладок из разных браузеров, ~22000 дублирующих закладок было удалено этим расширением предельно аккуратно в течение получаса!
В случае остальных приложений за это время удавалось либо вручную удалить из неудобного списка пару сотен ссылок с риском ошибиться, либо... дождаться окончания загрузки закладок в приложение.
В прочих проверенных расширениях для Firefox либо результаты поиска представлены несистематизированной свалкой, либо вовсе отсутствуют.
Так что искренне рекомендую Bookmark Dupes от Martin Väth! - Evaluat(ă) cu 1 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 18894841, o lună în urmăIt's slow down so much it makes frozen the app. It's waited for10 minutes without any response. It's just about 18000 -24000 bookmarks to process, certainly from several bookmarks from different times.
Interesting fact is the same addon from the same author works perfectly!!! ..in chrome based browsers(time to response fast to not:chrome,brave,vivaldi).Răspunsul dezvoltatorului
postat la o lună în urmăAs already written to quite some comments, the normal deletion speed is several thousands bookmarks per second. A considerable slower speed is almost certainly due to a bad configuration, e.g. another extension which plugs into the bookmark API and takes time for every bookmark deletion. You might want to retry with a plain firefox configuration (after saving and restoring only your bookmarks). BTW, the code for the chrome and firefox extension of Bookmark Dupes is practically identical as you can see on github. - Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Dendetta, o lună în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede GrzzlyBoer, 2 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 19507346, 2 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Phil, 4 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 2 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 18701784, 4 luni în urmăAn sich eine Spitzen-Erweiterung. Allerdings nach ca. 8 Stunden nur 274 von 89911 duplizierten Lesezeichen entfernt. Alle sonstigen Erweiterungen extra vorher deaktiviert.
Răspunsul dezvoltatorului
postat la 4 luni în urmăWie schon mehrmals geschrieben ist die normale Geschwindigkeit beim Löschen mehrere hundert/tausend Lesezeichen pro Sekunde - eigentlich nicht merkbar. Bis jetzt habe ich noch kein bei mir reproduzierbares Beispiel von deutlich langsamerem Verhalten gefunden. Wenn Du technisch genügend Erfahrung hast, kannst Du mal versuchen, die Lesezeichen als Datei zu exportieren und die alte Firefox-Konfiguration komplett zu löschen (d.h. die zugehörigen Dateien mal komplett verschieben) und dann im jungfräulichen Firefox nur diese Erweiterung und Lesezeichendatei zu benutzen um zu testen, ob es wirklich an der Erweiterung liegt (und auf diese Art zumindest eine Lesezeichendatei ohne Duplikate zu erhalten). - Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede anselmoarantes, 5 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 14816561, 5 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 19008459, 5 luni în urmădoes exactly what expected, nice selection possibilities, works in seconds.
cleaned up mess after duplicate sync of several devices with 2000+ bookmarks and 150+ folders in a couple of minutes.
thanks. - Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 13456598, 6 luni în urmă
Răspunsul dezvoltatorului
postat la 6 luni în urmăThe normal deletion speed is some hundred bookmarks per seconds. If it is considerably slower then very likely the cause is some bad configuration. An example might be another bookmark related addon is installed which slows down the process.- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Michael, 6 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede SusilaGuy, 7 luni în urmăFantastic! Just what I needed. Reduced my 13,000+ bookmarks to about 3500 and afterward, I was able to delete over 700 empty folders.
I loved that I could choose to retain the most current of each group of duplicates. Thank you. <3
...mathew - Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 18990312, 8 luni în urmăFirefox should have deduplication in bookmark management by default
- Evaluat(ă) cu 4 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 11270652, 8 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Utilizator Firefox 15012431, 8 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede John Doe, 9 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Tele Viper, 9 luni în urmă
- Evaluat(ă) cu 5 din 5 stelede Highness Emperor, 10 luni în urmă