Отзывы на CanvasBlocker
CanvasBlocker от kkapsner
Отзывы ©®°˜
Оценено на 5 из 5
от ©®°˜, 8 лет назад100% unique mean that is not really natural, canvas should not be unique but changed in order to be natural.
Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
Is like you said you have a device that never exist.
To better understand how this work :
Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.
On default settings may make it pass the google test.
For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.
Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easy
Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
Is like you said you have a device that never exist.
To better understand how this work :
Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.
On default settings may make it pass the google test.
For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.
Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easy
Ответ разработчика
размещено 8 лет назадPlease open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss this. AMOs rating comments are too limited to have a good conversation.
One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.
One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.
470 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Kumar, день назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19654712, 9 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Gab, 9 дней назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Gibby, 20 дней назадThis add-on breaks Google Maps on mobile. Google Maps is completely unusable; I am forever stuck on a constantly loading page that keeps switching between a blank page and the Google Maps page. Uninstalling this add-on did nothing, clearing cache and cookies did nothing, and even whitelisting the site itself in Canvas Blocker didn't do anything. I only ever started having this issue upon using this add-on.
And no, I'm not making an off-site account just to report this problem, I'm posting it here. Ridiculous. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Leviii, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19544944, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19173908, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Saint.77, 3 месяца назадOne of the essential plugins for everyone that care about anonymity when you surf on the web. If you stay on one of the 2 lowest settings you can increase your anonymity dramatically on the web without breaking functionality, so you can surf the web pretty much like everyone else without even noticing it while still staying hard to identify if you for example combine this with VPN. This alone will help but its one of several other key plugins you should install to shield yourself against tracking on the web.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Lilith D. Bracken, 3 месяца назадGreat privacy-focused extension that helps protect against fingerprinting. It blocks or fakes the data that websites use to track your device without your consent. I like that you can customize how strict it is for each site, so if something breaks, it’s easy to adjust. It runs quietly in the background and doesn’t slow things down. A must-have for anyone who cares about online privacy and wants more control over what sites can learn about their system.
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19490358, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Edgar Almeida, 4 месяца назадSeems to work, if you test it at browserleaks(dot)com / canvas with the plugin on, keeps giving new signatures at each refresh, if you turn the plugin off, the signature will remain the same
- Оценено на 5 из 5от 魔王, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Kal, 4 месяца назадDoesn't seem to work. Visited the EFF page (coveryourtracks.eff.org) to check fingerprinting and no luck.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Zertrax, 4 месяца назадWorks very well. If you want to test this addon whether it works or not, just visit the page which is mentioned in the description. (for example: browserleaks website)
It's just a shame that I only recently discovered canvas fingerprinting, even though it's been around for so long. Keep your privacy up folks. - Оценено на 5 из 5от whatever, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от VOIIIXI, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от CHANO, 6 месяцев назадI became suspicious when there is no tally count, so I went to coveryourtracks.eff. ran the fingerprinting scan and found the app was doing absolutely nothing at all but sitting in my browser collecting info.I will be removing it.And running a system malware scan.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19145735, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от NameOfDisplay, 6 месяцев назадI like the concept of the addon but this is basically useless until the developer explains literally anywhere how to add sites to the whitelist and the settings page doesn't absolutely suck.
Only really useful if you are the developer and understand all of the obtuse menu options. - Оценено на 4 из 5от Mikaela, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от BrunoFontes.Net, 7 месяцев назад