Отзывы на «Web Archives»
Web Archives от Armin Sebastian
Отзывы KirkH420
Оценено на 4 из 5
от KirkH420, 4 года назадIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
328 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 17451381, 3 дня назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Jalewood, 13 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 15958710, 22 дня назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Java, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19611278, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19604848, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от أبوعلي, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Ugarov, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18960744, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Deo, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Kaqxar, 5 месяцев назадAlas it breaks login pages which use Cloudflare captcha!
I first thought that uBO and/or Privacy Badger are the culprit and disabled those, but then still could reliably reproduce the bug. Then I disabled *ALL* my extensions and enabled them one by one, meanwhile testing logging in. When I turned on Web Archives, login stopped working, I got an error message after entering my credentials and clicking the "I am a human" checkbox on the popup Cloudflare captcha.
Once I disabled Web Archives, login started to work again.
Mind you, this test was done with uBO and PB still being disabled.Ответ разработчика
размещено 5 месяцев назадI don't see how this extension could break your login page, but if you'd open an issue on GitHub, we could debug the problem together by testing the same login page.
https://github.com/dessant/web-archives/issues - Оценено на 4 из 5от dost, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от frostbyte, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19173586, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19114790, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18905802, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19145735, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19128233, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от casi dancasy, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19096545, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от wertzuz, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Kay, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Kasander, 8 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от selmasoken, 9 месяцев назад