Отзывы на Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube)
Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube) от code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Отзывы Пользователь Firefox 16655537
Оценено на 5 из 5
от Пользователь Firefox 16655537, 8 месяцев назад776 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Yevhen Tretiakov, 7 часов назад
- Оценено на 3 из 5от stapuft, 5 дней назадWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 16 часов назадHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will.
This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering).
The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here.) - Оценено на 5 из 5от PP, 7 дней назадSeems to work for me. Haven't come across any issues for my uses
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Lakyn, 8 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от MetalGear89, 8 дней назадFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19465923, 12 дней назадThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18989911, 12 дней назад
- Оценено на 2 из 5от TS, 15 дней назадIt's very hit or miss if any of its features actually work on mobile. The interface is trash and the prevent autoplay toggle blocks the video from loading entirely.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 16 часов назадhi! This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here - Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 15037318, 16 дней назадIt does not even allow me to watch youtube videos after I had installed it!
Test it before making it available! - Оценено на 3 из 5от ueeu, 17 дней назадVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UIОтвет разработчика
размещено 16 часов назадYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Vangxim, 19 дней назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от SzymonL, 19 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 17491097, 20 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Cboom, 22 дня назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Ivia Relle, 22 дня назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Hoàng Hải Hậu, 25 дней назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 16779275, 25 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от coldcoffee, месяц назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от DOT, месяц назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19242234, месяц назадThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Ответ разработчика
размещено 23 дня назадHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We can also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).