Ocene za Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context — Wikiwand
Ocena uporabnika Smingus
Ocenjeno z 1 od 5
— Smingus, pred 3 letiWikiwand was one of the single best plugins for a web browser until this recent update. I don't even mind the UI overhaul because I found a color set that appealed to me a lot more than the previous light and dark mode. However, the search function has been totally butchered and there is a persistent notification in the upper right hand corner to add Wikiwand to Firefox which I obviously already have because I am looking at the page.
671 ocen
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Haltarys, pred 15 dneviThe extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 19053100, pred enim mesecemUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 19391462, pred enim mesecemwas a good addon until constant ai ads
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 19114790, pred 2 mesecema
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Sciky, pred 3 meseciThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Indiana Moon, pred 3 meseciIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Ocenjeno z 2 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 19063414, pred 3 meseciWikiwand was great, but now it's infested with AI popups, ads and the constant bugging to make an account. A shame because it used to be a great tool, now it's more work to click all the nonsense away.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Wamida, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— carl, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 14503325, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 19040033, pred 4 meseciUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 14706773, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Ally Simy, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 19035698, pred 4 meseciEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— LCM, pred 4 meseciThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 17979558, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Milan Regec, pred 4 meseciAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 18996590, pred 4 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Toccetness, pred 5 meseciAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 17669402, pred 5 meseciAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— marii, pred 5 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 17852983, pred 5 meseci