Recensioner för Dark Reader
Dark Reader av Dark Reader Ltd
658 recensioner
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14684293, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Dabaens, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14668694, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av jam, för 7 år sedanBest on desktop, good on mobile.
Maybe this wasn't developed with the android version in mind, but it does work on it and I have two minor issues: it flashes a white page on some page loads and it seems to be quite heavy for my Nokia 6.1., which leads it to crash every so often.
Other than that, great! Why does the internet still stick with blinding white pages with black text.. - Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 12869817, för 7 år sedan見やすくていいんだけど、webの読み込みが重くなる。残念だけどこれからの開発に期待してます。
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14656477, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av UriDrori, för 7 år sedanThe extension is fantastic, far better than any alternative I know of.
BUT: it seems to run significantly less smoothly than on Chrome, specifically running horribly on Google sites (Gmail, Calendar), Facebook and others. If you could some how address this issue it'll be great. - Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14644479, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Mais1Mano, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14635876, för 7 år sedanReally good but perfection-able: a function to change the font's size would be useful.
Sometime slow with some sites. - Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14362759, för 7 år sedanWorks really good.
It's only one star away from being top rated for me because I think the options menu could use a clean up its really messy.
AND its missing a feature.... i want Dark Reader to be by defaule OFF on all websites so that i can enable the ones I want to be dark individually myself, right now the reverse is true but i want to be able to pick what my own default is - Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 12338472, för 7 år sedanSometimes tends to block browser for a few seconds (when switching pages or toying with add-on settings), as if the add-on was doing too much computation. Could use some optimization I guess.
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Dwayne95, för 7 år sedanALMOST.... Perfect. Everything my eyes needed since then. Although, I wish there's an automation button that automatically darkens the website since I don't want to toggle every time I visit a new site. However, it's still an helpful app tho!
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av takutekato2, för 7 år sedanThis Extension provides excellent dark themes on almost all websites. But when I visited sites such as redhat.com/en/blog/..., my CPU usage went all the way to ~90% (a fairly new Intel i5) and RAM (4GB) continued being filled up until the whole system crashed.
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 13386478, för 7 år sedanIt is difficult to create an algorythm that would give the optimum result to every page on the net I imagine. That is why respect for the undertaking, thanks for delivery. The addon would greatly benefit from an integrated user feedback feature that just reports which site is with which mode is not working to arrive at an overview.
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av 3D-ICON, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14582039, för 7 år sedanThe only thing that would make this extension perfect for me is if your site lists could be synced across browser installations. Is it possible for extensions to use firefox sync?
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Amirho3in Edri30, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14566619, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av XNKOI, för 7 år sedan桌面版算很好用,Android 上也可以用,真的很不錯。只是 Android 上會造成網頁載入要花更多時間,也會造成崁入式瀏覽無法完成正常載入。
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av flaburgan, för 7 år sedanThis is an awesome addon, very useful. However, I would love to see its performance improved. It clearly slows done the loading of a page, even simple ones.
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 14525680, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Attila Szabó, för 7 år sedanIs is really a very useful addon, the only problem with it is that it slows down page loading. It is painfully so sometimes. Works better under chrome, i hope the developer will cope with this problem under firefox, too.