Recensioner för Privacy Badger
Privacy Badger av EFF Technologists
2 582 recensioner
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13337214, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Stavros, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av KristianLH, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13325415, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13314204, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av privacyrocks, för 8 år sedanTo not be tracked from site to site is great and PB does this without any fuss or muss. 10/10. Easy to use and install. Love EFF Tech.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13306618, för 8 år sedanI have a Pi-hole attached to my router which blocks a lot of ad-serving sites, trackers and malware sites.
I thought I had things covered pretty good, but when I started using Privacy Badger it still finds some trackers to block.
Great job EFF, thank you!
Now my only wish is that you make this available for MS Edge. I still prefer the lean-and-clean minimalistic approach of Edge over Firefox, but for privacy reasons (cookies management and Privacy Badger) I moved to Firefox. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av hjoseph7, för 8 år sedanWorks great in Chrome not, so great but good in Firefox. Does not slow down my browser at all. I think it also blocks some pop-up ads, but not all. Too bad MSN is not jumping on the bad wagon..
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Sion, för 8 år sedanHow does Privacy Badger interact with things like uBlock Origin & Ghostery?
Do their functions collide with Privacy Badger (PB), like they block something before PB can analyze it?Utvecklarens svar
postad för 8 år sedanPrivacy Badger should work well in combination with other blocking add-ons. The major difference between using Badger on its own and using Badger with other blockers is that your Badger will learn to block far fewer domains when used with other blockers. This is fine: Privacy Badger will be there to catch whatever the list-based blockers let through.
To get answers to Privacy Badger questions, please visit our GitHub issue tracker at github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/issues, or just email info@eff.org. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Wok, för 8 år sedanThis addon is very disappointing. I cannot give the reason why in this space because my reviews have already been deleted twice by the moderators. Just benchmark the addon for your Internet uses with uBO-Scope and see what is not blocked despite training Privacy Badger for weeks.
Edit: I update the score to positive, because the Google Analytics issue is fixed:
https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/issues/574#issuecomment-510036366Utvecklarens svar
postad för 8 år sedanWok, I understand you are frustrated with Privacy Badger not doing something you think it should. If this is about Privacy Badger not learning to block Google Analytics, we have an open issue for this problem, which I think you already discovered: https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/issues/367. We just haven't had a chance to look into it yet. If you'd like this issue to get more attention, please leave a comment there, or send an email to info@eff.org. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13192564, för 8 år sedanThe great difference between Privacy badger and other blockers is that it learns what follows me on the internet and blocks it on every website.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13040017, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13006668, för 8 år sedanExcellent! Use this and adblock on my laptop and it works very well!
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13241493, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Dark_Ronius, för 8 år sedanAdd-on, for me, largely replaces the old Ghostery add-on (which no longer blocks cookies or apparently much at all really). The traffic light system is insanely simple to understand, and makes it quick and easy to fine-tune your experience. It would be great if you could combine a filterlist with it so you have instant, out of the box protection without having to install an ad-blocker. It would also be great if it provided some indicator on why it considers a url to be tracking you- a hit count for each attempted access, for example, or even just make the title text for each site a darker font (and vice versa).
Also, I know they have done it for a while now, but I respect EFF for finally producing their Add-Ons on the official Firefox repository... Although they probably didn't have a choice with it impossible to install unsigned add ons now on anything but the Developer version of the browser. I feel this is what EFF should have done all along, to counter clones appearing instead, along with maybe a warning about Firefox's policies. Although I'm in support of the reasons EFF declined to upload add-ons like https Everywhere for such a long time, for me the ultimate aim of getting the protection offered to as many users as possible probably should have been the more important focus? - Betygsatt 5 av 5av J. Alberto Benitez, för 8 år sedanMuchas Gracias nos ayuda a comunicarnos mejor, que buena idea del desarrollador.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Alabhya Jindal, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 12949063, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13213392, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 12623088, för 8 år sedanTo all the fools here who underrate this add-on on the basis that it doesn't block some ads - you need to read the description before posting your ignorant crap in reviews. This is NOT an ad blocker, and it doesn't claim to block all kinds of ads. Stop whining that it is not something it never claimed to be in the first place.
That's like underrating a smartphone because it doesn't work well as a hammer. It's stupid and ignorant.
I would suggest to the developer to make it even more obvious that this is not meant to replace a conventional ad-blocker. Maybe put that in CAPS in the description for all the lazy users.
Great tool btw! :-)