Recensioner för Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers av Firefox
Recension av Firefox-användare 15040706
Betygsatt 4 av 5
av Firefox-användare 15040706, för 7 år sedanThis functionality is welcome. What was previously managed with multiple browser accounts can now be managed with only one (provided I use the same add-ons).
A few things that would make its initial and possibly regular use more convenient in my case, mainly different ways to sort websites into a container and make it defualt.
--ability to import bookmarks and bookmark folders so that they defualt to a specific container.
--ablity to sort "current tab" and "all open tabs" into a specific container when clicking on the add-on icon
--had minor issues with [are you sure you want to open this site in this container by defualt] message where it was sometimes unresponsive (I added an entire bookmark folder to a container and opened all at once) I mostly had to wait and reload before confirming.
--The ability to generally avoid/disable the [do you want this to defualt to this container] without individually using the [rmember for this site] setting might be welcome.
Consideration: if I'm already in a particular container and link to a site that would normally use a different container I would most likely not want it to instead remain in the current container or have me decide, unless in the defualt container. If the [remember for this site] option is not selected the message does serve that purpose but it's not useful when opening bookmarks. So implementation may have to be complicated or have to allow for various rules that are dependent on the current container.
A few things that would make its initial and possibly regular use more convenient in my case, mainly different ways to sort websites into a container and make it defualt.
--ability to import bookmarks and bookmark folders so that they defualt to a specific container.
--ablity to sort "current tab" and "all open tabs" into a specific container when clicking on the add-on icon
--had minor issues with [are you sure you want to open this site in this container by defualt] message where it was sometimes unresponsive (I added an entire bookmark folder to a container and opened all at once) I mostly had to wait and reload before confirming.
--The ability to generally avoid/disable the [do you want this to defualt to this container] without individually using the [rmember for this site] setting might be welcome.
Consideration: if I'm already in a particular container and link to a site that would normally use a different container I would most likely not want it to instead remain in the current container or have me decide, unless in the defualt container. If the [remember for this site] option is not selected the message does serve that purpose but it's not useful when opening bookmarks. So implementation may have to be complicated or have to allow for various rules that are dependent on the current container.
7 917 recensioner
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Arie, för en dag sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14150725, för 2 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 3 av 5av Firefox-användare 14541632, för 2 dagar sedanRecently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19787479, för 2 dagar sedanExcellent solution to manage multiple cloud tenant.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Jawa D. WAI, för 4 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Heruta, för 6 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av fsr, för 7 dagar sedanIt's excellent. Very useful for using the same website with different accounts, like your personal and work accounts.
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av altyspa, för 7 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av NeoOne, för 8 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av AjarAdore, för 11 dagar sedanQuite handy once you get the hang of it. I love the ability to purge cookies across a container, very useful. Honestly feel like this should be installed by default and enabled via settings.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Сырное, för 15 dagar sedanSo, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Mike Breytentebach, för 17 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av F33db4ck1, för 17 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 3 av 5av Queenie, för 17 dagar sedanl💗ve the concept, the excution is not working so well for me at present - I am not sure where the issue is, whether its in relation to my password keeper or the sites I am accessing (particularly where there is MFA).
Some are just getting caught in a constant login error loop (personally, I think its the sites - Xero, you are the main culprit, and its not unique to this browser or function).
I am new to containers, so still working out how to use them but I desperately want it to work as Chrome profiles have been an ongoing resource vampire. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 15136226, för 18 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Tom Fire, för 20 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 12683038, för 25 dagar sedanIntegration with Mozilla VPN is broken.
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Avakining, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 13036198, för en månad sedanI was enjoying this but I keep losing the containers. I have added containers twice only to find that it had once again disappeared.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19709229, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14477476, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 17989134, för en månad sedan