NoScript Security Suite incelemeleri
NoScript Security Suite geliştiren: Giorgio Maone
2.446 inceleme
- 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: PET-FOX, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 2 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13508642, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 2 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13508459, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 12674645, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13508328, 8 yıl önceI am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Reindl Harald, 8 yıl öncethe android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13507805, 8 yıl önceThe old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - 5 üzerinden 2 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13507402, 8 yıl önceNew addon for Firefox Quantum is bad. Why is log.js open always. I always get 1.000 notification on console and it takes more CPU usage. New interface is worse than old one. I can't understand which domain is blocked or allowed.
I want old interface an system back. If you can't do same. Do it similar. Or work with good interface designer. I don't want to delete this add-on.
I hope you can fix all problems soon. - 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Gorzag, 8 yıl önceVery useful extension. Happy to see the developer listened to our feedback.
- 5 üzerinden 2 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13507242, 8 yıl önceHey guys, even the new gui is not comfortable as it used to be and so on...please consider this as a free addon and how much time is needed to update it concerning the new quantum firefox code - just give it some time and a fair chance instead of bashing around - giorgio, please go on with your good work, so we can all benefit from noscript again
- 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13507221, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 3 puanyazan: photografx, 8 yıl önceThank you very much for your effort to make this work with "Quantum (57+)".
But please give us back some oft the ofunctionality and ease of use of the old version.
e.g. temporary allowing scripts
cheers - 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13167791, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13507030, 8 yıl önceActually a 5*, it might be language related but in germany the translations are way to long for the new interface (Words don't fit in the reserved space).
Sadly it looks really bad.
For the other stuff I like the uMatrix like way to control what gets loaded.
Also, even thought I need to look how it works somewhere, that we got some https contol looks promising. - 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Biohazard, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 2 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13506606, 8 yıl öncethis version is too complicated to handle for me. I am not the read-a-long-guide-before-doing-anything-complicated guy, so I am missing simplicity and intuitivity. I loved the former versions.
- 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13506290, 8 yıl önceYESS ! Available for Firefox 57 !
Thank you.
This Add-on is a must have !
It allows you to browse the web securely. - 5 üzerinden 1 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 12641543, 8 yıl önce
- 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13364029, 8 yıl önceDidn't work with https://www.rnz.de/ (no Pic) and it isn't opssible to login here at my Mozilla Account and my googlemail account works only with simple HTML with noscript active.
Update 28.11.17 - Good Work! Now everything is fine. - 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13505686, 8 yıl önceIt's not as functional as the original, and it took a while to figure out how to temporarily allow a script. You have to click twice on the trusted icon. The bottom line is it still works.
- 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13505627, 8 yıl önce1). As a regular NoScript user unfamiliar with code/script-related stuff, I must say this update is less UN-intuitive than the former and a bit more straightforward —still not a marvel in signage, indeed, but it never was, and seems it plays its role.
2). Mr. Maone is not obliged to respond to rude demands for his free, voluntary add-on. Those childish users calling us "bootlickers" hopefully will go away after another "better" (if possible) add-on, or even better, come with an improved one themselves. - 5 üzerinden 5 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13505381, 8 yıl önceI can tell the developers working on all the gripes i had. Good work to you all, have always loved this app and will continue to support it.
- 5 üzerinden 4 puanyazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13505104, 8 yıl önceI'm really glad NoScript made it to Quantum so quickly and the people who complain about missing features probably don't realize that this is a complete rewrite of an extension that has had the chance to mature for many, many years. Comparing the two is completely unfair and I really appreciate the many, many hours of spare time that has been put into this. I can see the UI could use some improvements, though. I would be very happy to lend you a hand with that if you want/need it (I work as a lead front-end developer), so let me know if you would like to take me up on that offer.