Відгуки для Archive Page
Archive Page автор John Navas
50 відгуків
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 9916638, 3 роки томуI use this extension multiple times every week. I have not had to wait in a queue for any length of time and that is worth 10 stars!
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Osman Koroglu, 3 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 17543614, 3 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Snoozeanne, 3 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від ertpecs, 3 роки томуquite possibly the second best add on for firefox, right behind ublock origin
edit 20241126 - this has worked great for years. however some sites have figured out how to bypass our bypass. still a 5 star add on, just hope that something can be figured out for the ones that got froggy - Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 15702693, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Upjohn, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від kcl, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Sterntaler, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Professor Pootis, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Josh, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Barmem, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Sergio, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 6648216, 4 роки томуSo simple, so functional. A must-have for the Жеn$оrship-conscious (sorry for the slight paranoia there), as this service, as compared to the 'original' doesn't respond to many tаkedоwns.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від CGC, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Rogach, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14819659, 5 років томуAbsolutely excellent archival service, don't forget to archive relevant posts today, for they might not be there tomorrow.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Vedun, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від bunnylace, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від TheforbiddenGabe, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13479481, 5 років томуsimple add-on and blazing fast service by archive.today!!
Till yesterday I used archiveror add-on which does the same job but requires 2 clicks. This one is better as it does the job in single click. Also, I prefer this website over all others including wayback, as it provides the url instantaneously and the length of url is short as well. Recently I found out that archive.is can be used as an workaround to read articles behind paywall/registration like NYT and washington post, I don't know how this works but it's like magic!!
Great job by the developers of the website and addon.
My only suggestion is to include an option to open the archive tab in background like in archiveor addon.
Also, I am greedy and I want more !! - please make a simple android app just like this, which can be used by clicking on share button on any app e.g. for twitter app: click share button > share tweet via > choose archive app icon > redirects to default browser with url just like this add-on > https : // archive . today/?run=1&url=
Edit - Developer has responded so promptly and clarified that this feature already exists! 10/10Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 5 років тому1. Options are available to control how the new tab is opened, foreground (active) or backgroound (inactive). Open Manage Extension and then Options.
2. The companion Android app is Share2Archive, available in Google Play. - Оцінка 5 з 5від worst, 5 років томуSo it would seem I'm the second user to install this add-on and the first user to review it. How exciting!
The current behavior when you click the icon is to check whether the page is archived, and if so it sends you to the most recent snapshot. If not, a snapshot is automatically taken of the page. This is pretty foolproof as archive.today already asks if you want to take a new snapshot if a snapshot exists and is older than 5 minutes, so there's no need to include a separate snapshot button.
The one thing I would change is to include an option in the settings to disable automatic submission for snapshots on click, as I can imagine a webdev or some similar case where a page that shouldn't have been uploaded ends up archived accidentally via misclick or whatever.
Keep up the great work John!Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 5 років томуThank you. I'm trying to keep this simple and foolproof for regular users, so I'm reluctant to do anything that might make it more complicated, and I don't think there's much extra load from mistakes, but if you give me more details of what you have in mind, I'll give it serious consideration. Thanks again.