Відгуки для CanvasBlocker
CanvasBlocker автор kkapsner
365 відгуків
- Оцінка 5 з 5від JanKKM, 7 років томуThe addon works perfectly. I tested all extensions for blocking canvas and this one definitely does the best job.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14244108, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14307734, 7 років томуHello, excellent program, for when a version for the Opera browser ??????
Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуA version for Opera or Chrome is not planned. They do not provide the necessary APIs to provide the same quality of protection. - Оцінка 5 з 5від Darsh229, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14300424, 7 років томуIt gets the job done.
Didn't even know I need it until a web page started to abuse canvas to shove ads in your face - Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14097838, 7 років томуA must have privacy extension for everyone!
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14242164, 7 років томуGreat stuff. I think this should be a "featured extension" in the pivacy and security category.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14054127, 7 років томуNice, but the toolbar icon changes color sometimes (red/green). What do the different colors mean?
Green = I'm save, red = I'm not protected? And what do I have to do for it to protect me again?Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуThe color change just indicate that something was faked. It's some sort of notification and nothing to worry about. - Оцінка 5 з 5від Detergent, 7 років томуI tested this addon with the Panopticlick test from the EFF, and when I check the 'full results' it shows that the hash values are changed every time I have the addon enabled. So I guess it's basically ruining it for people who use these values to track you.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від kondor, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від samyueru_beityosef_benmayumi, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Fleet Command, 7 років томуIt is great, but it'd be much better if the Mozilla Add-ons link embedded in it was language-agnostic. Currently, it is to the German version of the site.
Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуThis issue will be fixed in the next version: https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues/219 - Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14201700, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14191840, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від pix0wl, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 12654054, 7 років томуExcellent add-on! Thanks for your hard work!
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14191652, 7 років томуVery nice works.
But it may not pass detective on test page http://101.37.204.139:8080/uapost.html.when try times test, it may enter an endless loop and Let the browser stop working.Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуThis page doen't even work when no addon at all is installed... but to discuss this further please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues
Communication is much easier there. - Оцінка 5 з 5від zhaqenl, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13202285, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від The Beard Below My Chin, 7 років томуNice works.
Please note I test the audio fingerprint at https://audiofingerprint.openwpm.com/ and it causes browser slowdown.Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуI know - this page is not written in a peformant way. You can test the audio fingerprint at http://kkapsner.github.io/CanvasBlocker/test/audioTest.html as well. - Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14156124, 7 років томуNice works.
Please note it does not detect (and block) the code embedded in a url through the
"data:text/html" directive.
I don't know if this method it's exploitable in a web page
example: paste the following code on your navigation bar
(It's a dots wave single pixel plotter, so it uses getImageData and it works even if you block the readout API):
edit: sample code moved to pastebin (sorry, pasting the code here does not works):
https://pastebin.com/pFvdgKNNВідповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуGood point. I will see if this is exploitable. But please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss the implications and findings. Also communication is much easier there. - Оцінка 5 з 5від GregDT, 7 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13835690, 7 років томуThank you for this extension (and for keeping it opensource). Nowadays it's getting harder and harder to get a sense of real privacy. CanvasBlocker + AdGuard for Windows + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + custom user.js helps me feel safer on a growing data collection frenzy.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від ©®°˜, 7 років тому100% unique mean that is not really natural, canvas should not be unique but changed in order to be natural.
Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
Is like you said you have a device that never exist.
To better understand how this work :
Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.
On default settings may make it pass the google test.
For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.
Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easyВідповідь розробника
оприлюднено 7 років томуPlease open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss this. AMOs rating comments are too limited to have a good conversation.
One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.