Відгуки для Nano Defender for Firefox
Nano Defender for Firefox автор LiCybora
Відгук від Valmont
Оцінка 4 з 5
від Valmont, 6 років томуOk, I have enough of it (of getting this to work). It looked like the devs fixed it, but here's the issue:
Installed Nano Defender and Nano Adblocker to keep it simple. Both from AMO. Doesn't work on certain websites though. For example for imgView.net, https://imgrock.pw/ , https://imgtown.pw and so forth.
Tried the quick issue submitter, but it gave me a hard time. It said the issue is fixed. Maybe it was, but it's not anymore. So I was required to go to Github. Little bit too nerdy for me. Spent half an hour just to find a unused username to sign up.
I did try to add the issue, but I did it wrong and I can't be bothered to "study" how to report an issue. You almost need a license just to be able to report something. I'm happy with simply being an end-user.
Two stars for the effort because I don't like 1 star. But right now it hasn't been a success for me.
Edit: added a star because it looks like the devs are really trying. This is a toughie though.
Edit 2: added another star (to 4) because it does a good job overall.
Installed Nano Defender and Nano Adblocker to keep it simple. Both from AMO. Doesn't work on certain websites though. For example for imgView.net, https://imgrock.pw/ , https://imgtown.pw and so forth.
Tried the quick issue submitter, but it gave me a hard time. It said the issue is fixed. Maybe it was, but it's not anymore. So I was required to go to Github. Little bit too nerdy for me. Spent half an hour just to find a unused username to sign up.
I did try to add the issue, but I did it wrong and I can't be bothered to "study" how to report an issue. You almost need a license just to be able to report something. I'm happy with simply being an end-user.
Two stars for the effort because I don't like 1 star. But right now it hasn't been a success for me.
Edit: added a star because it looks like the devs are really trying. This is a toughie though.
Edit 2: added another star (to 4) because it does a good job overall.
Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 6 років томуThe reason we need multiple information because we cannot reproduce issue for those sites. Therefore we ask for step to reproduce, screenshot and console in order to know what's wrong. Although it is complicated for reporters, those are required or we cannot fix without knowing the cause.
Even though your issue being closed as invalid, you can still modify your issue. Once your issue can be reproduced, your issue will be re-considered (this time I edit for you for your reference).
Edit: Your issue is confirmed and we are working on your issue right now. Please wait for next version for fix.
Even though your issue being closed as invalid, you can still modify your issue. Once your issue can be reproduced, your issue will be re-considered (this time I edit for you for your reference).
Edit: Your issue is confirmed and we are working on your issue right now. Please wait for next version for fix.
144 відгуки
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 17243298, 2 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Mob, 3 роки тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Shaqtin', 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від a_developer_fastidious_about_specifications, 4 роки томуこれは [広告をブロックする仕組みをブロックする仕組みをブロックする拡張機能] です。 しかし、 正常に動作しません。 具体例として、 以下のメッセージが表示されます。
URL: https://nikkan-spa.jp/
========================================
コンテンツブロックが有効であることを検知しました。
このサイトを利用するには、コンテンツブロック機能(広告ブロック機能を持つ機能拡張等)を無効にしてページを再読み込みしてく>ださい
========================================
なお、 Firefox には [広告をブロックする仕組みをブロックする仕組みをブロックする拡張機能] が 2つ存在します。 [Anti-Adblock Blocker] と [Nano Defender for Firefox] です。 両方で上記のメッセージが表示されます。 よって、 全滅です。 - Оцінка 1 з 5від Nuno Leal Correia, 4 роки томуNano Defender Integracion and filters are outdated because gitcdn.xyz its down an long time ago! Please update sources.
In alternative you can use mirrors to continue using Nano Defender. Google it - Оцінка 1 з 5від –Phase–, 4 роки томуThe extra instructions for uBlock Origin no longer apply as the filters listed for them are broken. This still hasn't been fixed after months and months, and the creator has seemingly disappeared from the internet judging by their github profile, so I've given up on this extension and its filter lists. I recommend people use the Fuck Fuckadblock filter list instead, it seems to do everything this extension and its filter lists used to do and more: https://github.com/bogachenko/fuckfuckadblock
- Оцінка 3 з 5від phytolen, 4 роки томуextra steps for ublock origin not working.
'nano filter', 'nano defender' does not update after subscribing. (0 used out of 0)
i cannot view any filter list when i click on the links in 'extra steps' except below mentioned case.
'adblock warning removal list' does not show up even after subscribing. When i copy it custom filters it doesn't get copied. - Оцінка 4 з 5від smishe, 4 роки томуcannot Subscribe to Adblock Warning Removal List ,seems I'm not alone.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Qaidul, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від IceeeBuckets, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13891651, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 3 з 5від hijacked, 4 роки томуIt's more than 6 months that is impossible to install Adblock Warning Removal List... A bug fix never came
- Оцінка 4 з 5від Користувач Firefox 15054869, 5 років томуStill kind of concerned about the future of this extension, also wondering why the author didn't decide to change the name of the extension to distance the Firefox version from the Chromium version (the Chromium version was bought out and is no longer safe to use).
Aside from that it is pretty decent, I personally use it alongside uBlock Origin on FF (I never used it back when I was on Chrome years ago). It works very well, just make sure you go through the proper setup if you use it with uBlock Origin. - Оцінка 4 з 5від sate5232, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від John Staples, 5 років томуPeople! research thorough, the malicious one is the chromium version. Not FF, no need for the 1 star reviews....
- Оцінка 5 з 5від rakuzo, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Ben Shapiro, 5 років томуFantastic add-on. It is NOT malicious. Only the chromium version. Anyone saying so below has done zero actual research on the topic:
https://github.com/LiCybora/NanoDefenderFirefox/issues/187#issue-718878286 - Оцінка 5 з 5від NiekNLD, 5 років томуgiving it 5 stars (which it deserves) for compensating the brainless monkeys that 1 star this after 1 minute of "research"
- Оцінка 1 з 5від testing123, 5 років томуArs Technica says uninstall immediately!!! https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/10/popular-chromium-ad-blockers-caught-stealing-user-data-and-accessing-accounts/
Відповідь розробника
оприлюднено 5 років томуPlease read also: https://github.com/LiCybora/NanoDefenderFirefox/issues/187#issue-718878286
The harmful one is on Chromium only and nothing about Firefox
Before spreading/forwarding message, please make sure it is a fact. - Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 15724737, 5 років томуFirefox port maintainer is not the same with chrome's, this plugin is safe.
- Оцінка 4 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13613097, 5 років томуI was able to add the filters for Step 2 and Step 4 in the uBlock Origin settings,
Extra installation steps for uBlock Origin Step 1 Adblock Warning Removal List. Cannot be added.