Раньше управление было удобнее. Сейчас жутко неудобно.

このアドオンは確かに素晴らしい機能を持っています。
しかし最新版になってからは、非常にサイトの読み込みが遅くなりました。
アドオンを無効にしたら、とても快適にブラウジング出来ています。
この現象が解消されないかぎり、私はこのアドオンを使うことはないでしょう。

Good concept, but it doesn't save the state you select for a site. It keeps blocking Javascript on Facebook even after I enable it.

La última versión es tan incómoda de usar que la he quitado.

Please, explain in the add-on description why does NoScript now ask for a new permission to "download files and read and modify the browser's download history".

Besides, the new UI quite sucks, but the rules list semi-transparency seems to be what makes the NoScript Settings page sluggish.

Whoa, this new version is great! Jus' like 2 girls 1 cup!
PS: Why NoScript need to read the download history now? LOL
———
EDIT: Ok, that's fine. Thank you for the reply. Still, the new version is unfriendly, like others say too.
———
EDIT after 2 years i tried it again: UI still sucks, my rating remains 2/5. Too bad.

In its current state, it is barely serviceable. It is still better than nothing, I know, because when I disabled it I started getting hijacked by rogue webpage scripts again. But it has alot of catching up to do to be as pleasing as the pre-Quantum version.

That annoying, user unfriendly popup window really has to go. The previous version had a more discreet and tolerable messaging UI at the bottom of the screen. Now it is in popup window format at the top of the page, in your face to annoy you very quickly.

And a suggestion of a much needed feature. An option dedicated to automatically allowing Facebook scripts. Since nearly every website now days has scripts for Facebook, it is getting tiresome to have to allow Facebook with nearly every website I visit.

Crashes Firefox and interface is way worse.

The addon doesn't save trusted, untrusted and custom entries. Maybe the plugin stores information in non-persistent storage (which is cleared with any privacy-aware configuration).

This makes the plugin unusable, as re-allowing all services every single time is way more time consuming than just blocking scripts alltogether.

And even if you manage to save settings, they're not synched, so users who use two or more devices need to re-apply settings every time, on every. single. device.

The old version worked a whole lot better, it's a shame this level of quaity has not yet been achieved on the new WebExtension version.

The latest extension for Firefox Quantum is a real PITA because whitelisted sites are not saved, so they have to be recreated every time FF restarts. Extremely annoying and time consuming.

This crap does not remember settings, it loads default settings everytime I start firefox..

Before latest Firefox update, I would have given this add-on a 5. The current version has left me disappointed.

It does work (more or less) so I cannot justify a 1-star rating. But like others have said, this is not the NoScript we knew and loved. And while I know there is a temptation to just blame Firefox57 for old addons no longer working well, the truth is that we cannot blame Firefox57 for the dreadful new interface that NoScript has, nor for the buggy way it works (forgetting your settings, for example).

I don't want to be overly harsh here. For many years this developer has given us a fantastic product that millions of us found "essential". For that he must be commended. However, the new NoScript no longer has a place in my little "arsenal of defence". I've moved on.

If anyone is interested in alternatives, I find uBlock Origin is enough for my needs, provided the "I'm an advanced user" option is checked off and third party scripts / frames are globally blocked ("medium blocking mode", as per the author). If you want more power, there is uMatrix - still not a 100% replacement for NoScript but good enough for the vast majority of people.

Had better experiences with NoScript years ago. The new version with the current Firefox is bad. It forgets settings and is buggy. I'am using ScriptSafe now. It's the same as under chrome. This addon works fine.

The new version has to be fixed full stop. The UI did not need to be fixed. And now the app does not remember settings on some sites. I'm thinking about uninstalling this until it is back up to its previous quality.

In its current state it is absolutly not functional and productive. I liked the older interface a lot more.

Just joined on here to give my view.

I've used NoScript continually since its inception and thinking back there were a few hiccups early days which over time got ironed out, I think it will be the same with this version.

There were lots of folk ranting when it couldn't be used on the new Firefox, some demanding that something be done instantly, which was obviously impossible.

Giorgio obviously got on with this version and possibly rushed both building it and putting it out, these things happen.

However, buggy though it is, it is useable and as with all similar programs when many folk start using them bugs surface, the bugs are a PITA but hopefully, with time, will be resolved.

Lets not forget, that thanks to Giorgio's time and effort over the years, many thousands of surfers, me included, have been protected from who knows what was lurking behind some scripts.

Why not cut him a little slack, even such as the mighty Microsoft, Google, Apple and such others put out buggy stuff and that's with their thousands of programmers and millions of pounds!

So why have I given it two ( for the time being ) stars.

Mainly due to two things.

One, to me very important, there not being available, from the day it came out, any decent instructions in layman's terms, as to how to use it, I'm reasonably computer savvy and can normally get my head around most things, eventually, but this had me going spare, marking sites as trusted then having them revert to untrusted after shutting down and re-starting was a real pain, until I discovered only this morning, whilst reading these revues, that a simple click of the little clock solved this problem, thanks to those who mentioned it.

The second reason was because of the initial buggy nature of the first release.

Will I continue using it, of course.

Why, simply because, even as it is, I can't find another program that is as good as this one and going by past experience it will settle down.

Thanks Giorgio

There is a problem with the settings. Every time I close Firefox , the settings of what sites are trusted is lost. Every time I start Firefox, I have to configure each page all over again. This is very annoying.