Bitwarden – 免费密码管理器 的评价
Bitwarden – 免费密码管理器 作者: Bitwarden Inc.
Gongloss 的评价
评分 1 / 5
来自 Gongloss,1 年前UPDATED REVIEW: It's even worse than I thought. I'm in the middle of using a web interface to configure a linux server, and discovered that every time I open a user for any of the services on the server, this plugin shoves the main login for the control panel into anything, on any page or subdomain, that it thinks might be a login, even if there's already something there, causing all my previously configured account I edit for any service—MySql users, FTP users, everything—to be overwritten with my root login and password without my realizing it every time I so much as want to change an option for them. I am lowering my rating from 2 stars to 1 star and uninstalling this plugin. Bitwarden is now not just annoying to use, it's now actually destructive, it's destroyed my server account configurations because of this inexcusably poor design. I am uninstalling BitWarden and will never touch it again with a ten foot pole. This is beyond a nightmare.
I should have guessed. I knew that including 2FA and password storage in the same service was incredibly dangerous and lousy design, and I went ahead and thought I could use the features anyway and they'd be ok. I should have known.
PREVIOUS REVIEW:
This plugin is terrible.
What good is a password manager if the auto-fill is broken? 9 times out of 10, even though BitWarden does have a login saved for a site, if I go to that site, I have to manually open BitWarden to look up the login because the autofill, which I do have turned on, simply does not work.
(And on the 10th time, it takes so long to autofill it that I have given up on waiting and started to type it, and THEN it tacks the password onto the end of what I've already typed, so I have to reload the page and wait for the autofill again.)
I might as well just save my logins in a text file.
Disgraceful and frustrating. I'm glad I didn't pay for this service.
I should have guessed. I knew that including 2FA and password storage in the same service was incredibly dangerous and lousy design, and I went ahead and thought I could use the features anyway and they'd be ok. I should have known.
PREVIOUS REVIEW:
This plugin is terrible.
What good is a password manager if the auto-fill is broken? 9 times out of 10, even though BitWarden does have a login saved for a site, if I go to that site, I have to manually open BitWarden to look up the login because the autofill, which I do have turned on, simply does not work.
(And on the 10th time, it takes so long to autofill it that I have given up on waiting and started to type it, and THEN it tacks the password onto the end of what I've already typed, so I have to reload the page and wait for the autofill again.)
I might as well just save my logins in a text file.
Disgraceful and frustrating. I'm glad I didn't pay for this service.
8,810 条评价
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18881377,8 小时前Was perfect until they recently updated it and redesigned the extension. Now it fails to save logins frequently unless I open a separate window. It is also a lot slower than it use to be.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18881047,11 小时前the add on refuses to stay open while windows hello biometric unlock occurs which breaks the unlock. I have to open it in the add on side panel to force it to stay open while focus changes to the biometric authentication. no other browser on windows, mac, or linux has this issue with the bitwarden add on. it is only firefox and only on windows. please fix this issue
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Julya,14 小时前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18880176,1 天前Destroys browser performance. What happened? I genuinely disable it when I'm not actively needing it. What a let down. Used it for years. Looking for an alternative now.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 David G,1 天前Top. Très complet.
Mais pourquoi est-ce si compliqué d'aller chercher un id et un mot de passe.
Clic droit > Bitwarden >saisi automatique de l'identifiant > identifiant !!
Pourquoi pas clic droit > identifiant ??? - 评分 5 / 5来自 Bashiru Mansaray,1 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Untwist3419,1 天前Slow, buggy since the UI update. It take almost 60 seconds to update a password now, not use able anymore.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Alex,3 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Mustafa Çetin Dallı,3 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 ramiel,4 天前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 speed,4 天前Ive never written reviews. But bitwarden has become bad and frustrating. Crazy.
The thing is, I have a protonmail subscription. I was just testing out proton-pass, i rarely used my sub because I just used it for mail. But _wow_. Proton-pass is so good! I will use that for now, the impression is awesome.
Sad bitwarden turned out like this. Im actually a paying customer. - 评分 3 / 5来自 VJ99,4 天前Gotten slow and buggy ever since they redid the UI. I'll take the old, working version back.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Bum,4 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 nohok,5 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Pranav TP,5 天前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 AJLobo,5 天前I rarely write reviews, but I think this is warranted. The clean, minimal interface that we used to have is gone in favor of a more clunky, busy UI. This is a regression. It even takes over a second to load all the elements on the popout. Also, why would you hide the autofill function under a secondary menu when this is the entire reason we use this extension?!
Lastly, now it gives you suggestions for logins which take priority over your favorited logins. What's next, AI integration to better inform us on how to use a password vault? - 评分 5 / 5来自 sayimburak,6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Gian,6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 ig,6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 msalo3,7 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 9771322,7 天前Всё что с привязкой почты это ерунда: не известно кто и как использует их на другом сервере. Я бы ни кому не рекомендовал. Мастер пароль и все пароли должены храниться только на вашем устройстве.
______________________________________
Everything related to mail binding is nonsense: it is not known who uses them on another server or how. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. The master password and all passwords should be stored only on your device. - 评分 2 / 5来自 Gilladur,7 天前I have to agree to the negative feedback on the latest version. The extension is less intuitive.
I'm really missing the function to use a catch all email and have the domain automatically set as the local part (domain@catchall.xyz) - why was this function removed?