Bitwarden – 免费密码管理器 的评价
Bitwarden – 免费密码管理器 作者: Bitwarden Inc.
charles.ee 的评价
评分 4 / 5
来自 charles.ee, 8 年前Edit: One huge plus in Bitwarden's favor is actually implementing 2fa in a way that makes sense. If you want to use a Yubikey, but then fall back to Google Authenticator, you can. Unlike Lastpass, where it's one or the other, something almost none of the other services I use 2fa with seem to restrict.
I'm giving Bitwarden a try as Lastpass drops the ball on Firefox support.
It's very clean, and quick. Parts of the interface are clunky (when you edit/save a new login, the giant green bar indicating that YAY YOU SAVED covers up ALL the useful buttons in the interface and doesn't time out nearly quickly enough, forcing you to click the X even to perform a simple task that shouldn't involve the notification.)
It's not quite as good at detecting login pages and offering to save logins as Lastpass. If you ever need to toggle away to, let's say, copy a Authenticator code the extension completely closes and you have to re-type everything, even if you were in the middle of adding a new login. So even if you're only half-done, make sure to save even if your new entry is incomplete.
It seems to especially fail to capture new logins if you have two-factor authentication enabled for your accounts (which really, you should, right?)
It would be nice to create a folder/category for your login in the very same screen that you create a new login. It's clunky to create a login, then toggle over to settings, create a folder, then toggle back over to your vault, and finally assign the login a folder.
The extensions don't sync automatically, or don't sync very often. Which means changes in your vault or in another browser don't sync until you manually click a button. That's an extra step that seems unnecessary.
That said, I went ahead and paid for Premium even if I don't plan on switching away from Lastpass. It seems like there's a lot of room to focus on exactly what used to make Lastpass great, before it started to get bogged down in sluggish UI and doubled in price without any real increase to functionality.
I'm giving Bitwarden a try as Lastpass drops the ball on Firefox support.
It's very clean, and quick. Parts of the interface are clunky (when you edit/save a new login, the giant green bar indicating that YAY YOU SAVED covers up ALL the useful buttons in the interface and doesn't time out nearly quickly enough, forcing you to click the X even to perform a simple task that shouldn't involve the notification.)
It's not quite as good at detecting login pages and offering to save logins as Lastpass. If you ever need to toggle away to, let's say, copy a Authenticator code the extension completely closes and you have to re-type everything, even if you were in the middle of adding a new login. So even if you're only half-done, make sure to save even if your new entry is incomplete.
It seems to especially fail to capture new logins if you have two-factor authentication enabled for your accounts (which really, you should, right?)
It would be nice to create a folder/category for your login in the very same screen that you create a new login. It's clunky to create a login, then toggle over to settings, create a folder, then toggle back over to your vault, and finally assign the login a folder.
The extensions don't sync automatically, or don't sync very often. Which means changes in your vault or in another browser don't sync until you manually click a button. That's an extra step that seems unnecessary.
That said, I went ahead and paid for Premium even if I don't plan on switching away from Lastpass. It seems like there's a lot of room to focus on exactly what used to make Lastpass great, before it started to get bogged down in sluggish UI and doubled in price without any real increase to functionality.
8,881 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Psychotic Casual, 1 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17796473, 5 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18960626, 6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Ambitious Diokpa 19, 6 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15432126, 7 天前Great extension but requires lots of memory and I suspect memory leak problem. The longer the extension is opened the more memory it takes. Browser without this extension switched on takes 600MB memory and after switching it on takes 2600MB. This should be investigated. Users are complaining about that sinco at least 2022.
- The default click action on the passwords shown in the drop down list should be to fill the form, not to enter into the details of a login, this was a recent change that's annoying.
Also, I notice spikes in CPU usage from this extension, that are power hungry and impacts my battery life a lot in desktop. - Bitwarden isn't just a password manager; it's your essential key to secure and effortless online logins via its browser extension.
- Secure Password Management: Securely stores, generates, and encrypts all your passwords and sensitive information.
- Seamless Autofill: Integrates perfectly with your browser, automatically and safely filling logins, payment cards, and identities.
- Open Source & Trustworthy: Free, open-source, and regularly audited. Your data is end-to-end encrypted before it ever leaves your device.
- Cross-Platform Access: Syncs your secure vault across all your devices, always accessible through the extension or apps.
- Simple & Effective: An intuitive interface makes adopting strong security habits easy for everyone.
That's it! Install the extension, set up your vault, and instantly upgrade your online security. Bitwarden is a must-have for protecting your digital life with ease and confidence. Huge thanks to the developers for creating and maintaining this indispensable, trustworthy tool. Highly recommended for everyone! - 评分 5 / 5来自 Janie Hund, 9 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Roy Vieira, 10 天前
- Well its ok, but also sucks. For example, it has a report that shows you where you reuse passwords. If you have a single entry that has two different URL's like parts.ford.com and ford.com, it counts that as two passwords, however it is only one. And if from that report you try to delete one, it deletes them both. This kind of BS goes on throughout the app. It seems to be developed by folks who don't think deeply.
Another example? No 2 sites on the internet agree on what makes a password. Some only only all 10 characters, some 20, some restrict what special characters can be used, others dont. Instead of letting you quickly adjust when adding a site or changing a password you have to go change the default settings for the password generator, and then remember to set them back to something secure. Just asinine. - 1 step forward 2 steps back. Each realease makes annoying ui changes that make it less user friendly. Latest version, ctrl+y to (in firefox) doesn't give focus to the search vault. It may sound trivial, but when I use this password manager in very delicate environments, using the mouse to search is a pain in th a$$
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18945435, 15 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Sweetbombeet, 16 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 olliesnape101, 17 天前Doesn't work with biometrics on either Windows desktop or android. Constantly logs you out even after adjusting settings, and doesn't connect to desktop app properly.